ArticleAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Measurement of the Memory B Cell Response via Antibodies from Activated Cells.
Article in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibodies in plasma and blood cells of horses.Open veterinary journal · 2026Article
- Conversion Factors to Compare Serum Concentrations of Anti-HBs, Anti-SARS-CoV-2 and Anti-Tetanus Toxin IgG.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Epitope-Based Vaccines: The Next Generation of Promising Vaccines Against Bacterial Infection.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Pemphigoid disease model systems for clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe body's immune response to infections and vaccination leads to the formation of memory B cells (MBCs), which protect against future infections. MBCs circulate in the blood, and the strength of the MBC response is measured with different tests. In this study, tests to measure the MBC response were compared.
methodsAn MBC enzyme-linked immunospot assay (MBC-ELISpot), which counts the antibody-releasing cells (MASCs) that arise from memory B cells in vitro, and two versions of an MBC enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MBC-ELISA), which measures the concentration of antibodies released by the MASCs, were compared. The lower measurement limit of MBC-ELISpot and ELISA was determined, and it was investigated how the measurement results of individual samples and in a sample of test persons correlate.
resultsBoth methods had similar lower limits of detection, and the antibody concentration correlated strongly with the number of MASCs in individual samples. The antibody concentrations measured on a sample correlated with Pearson correlation coefficients of R = 0.83-0.87 with the number of MASCs, and the proportion of antigen-specific antibodies in total IgG correlated with R = 0.74-0.82 with the proportion of antigen-specific MASCs in all antibody-secreting cells.
conclusionsSince the measurement sensitivity of MBC-ELISA and MBC-ELISpot is similar and the measurement results correlate strongly in a random sample, the tests are interchangeable. The MBC-ELISA has an advantage over the ELISpot in that the antibody measurements can be divided up over time, repeated, and extended. This creates new possibilities for measuring the MBC response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.