ArticleThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2024
[Efficacy of Fecal Microbial Transplantation for Improving Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome - A Pilot Study for Voluntary Participants in Korea].
Article in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-Reported Food Triggers and Food Fears Impact Nutrient Intake and Quality of Life in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia.The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic, intractable functional disease. It is inferred that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may have favorable efficacy on IBS by gut microbial modification. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of FMT for improving severity in patients with IBS. Methods: Patients who voluntarily wanted FMT were consecutively enrolled. The study subjects were classified by subtype of IBS by the ROME IV criteria. The IBS-symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) was used to evaluate the efficacy of FMT. The subjects completed a questionnaire at baseline week 0 and weeks 4, 12, and 24 after FMT. FMT was performed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy using frozen stock stool solution. If the follow-up IBS-SSS achieved less than 75 points, it was defined as remission. Adverse events were also gathered. Results: Twenty-one subjects were included from October 2023 until July 2024. There were 7 patients with IBS-C, 10 patients with IBS-D, 2 patients with IBS-M, and 2 patients with IBS-U type. The mean SSS of the IBS-D group was 244.0±64.2, which was higher than IBS-C group (192.9±85.4). Alleviations in IBS-SSS after FMT were observed in 19 subjects (19/21, 90.5%) at week 4. At week 12, 71.4% (5/7) in the IBS-C group and 20.0% (2/10) in the IBS-D group achieved remission. The remission states were maintained up to week 24 and no serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: FMT might be an effective treatment option for improving symptoms of mild to moderate IBS, especially IBS-C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.