ArticleBMC nephrology2024
Effects of immunosuppressive therapy on renal prognosis in primary membranous nephropathy.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmunosuppressive therapy plays a crucial role in treating membranous nephropathy, with previous studies highlighting its benefits for patients with primary membranous nephropathy (PMN). Guidelines suggest that the management of membranous nephropathy should be tailored to individual risk levels. However, there is a lack of real-world studies examining the effects of immunosuppressive therapy on renal outcomes in PMN patients. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between immunosuppressive therapy and renal prognosis in PMN patients.
methodsThis was a real-world retrospective study including patients diagnosed with PMN in Shenzhen Second People's Hospital and Hechi People's Hospital. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used.
resultsAfter propensity score-matching, 464 PMN patients were included and they were assigned to conservative and immunosuppressive group in a 1:1 ratio. Immunosuppressive therapy was the protective factor of renal composite outcome (HR = 0.65, p < 0.01). Separately, the effect was significant in moderate- and high-risk but not in low-risk patients. Key influencing factors including age, blood pressure, albumin and total cholesterol levels, with slight differences among patients at different risk.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in non-low-risk PMN patients. The key factors affecting renal prognosis in patients with different risk levels are emphasized to help provide individualized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.