Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449103›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2024

Plant conservation in the age of genome editing: opportunities and challenges.

Kangquan Yin, Mi Yoon Chung, Bo Lan, Fang K Du, Myong Gi Chung

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kangquan Yin *School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. yinkq@bjfu.edu.cn.
Mi Yoon Chung *Department of Biological Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 34134, South Korea.
Bo LanSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Fang K DuSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. dufang325@bjfu.edu.cn.
Myong Gi ChungDivision of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, 52828, South Korea.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 2021ZY80National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR) NIBR202305202National Natural Science Foundation of China 42071060Science and Technology Innovation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2022JBGS0020Special Program for the Institute of National Parks KFJ-STS-ZDTP-2022-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous plant taxa are threatened by habitat destruction or overexploitation. To overcome these threats, new methods are urgently needed for rescuing threatened and endangered plant species. Here, we review the genetic consequences of threats to species populations. We highlight potential advantages of genome editing for mitigating negative effects caused by new pathogens and pests or climate change where other approaches have failed. We propose solutions to protect threatened plants using genome editing technology unless absolutely necessary. We further discuss the challenges associated with genome editing in plant conservation to mitigate the decline of plant diversity.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEndangered SpeciesGene EditingGenome, PlantPlantsClimate ChangeCRISPR-Cas SystemsClimate changeConservationCRISPRDeleterious mutationGenetic diversityGenomics

Identifiers

PMID39449103
PMCPMC11515576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.