Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449084›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2024

Barriers and facilitators to primary healthcare utilization among immigrants and refugees of low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Seyed Mohammad Iman Moezzi, Manal Etemadi, Kamran Bagheri Lankarani, Masoud Behzadifar, Hamidullah Katebzada, Saeed Shahabi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Crossing Borders: SRH Challenges Among Immigrant and Minority Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seyed Mohammad Iman MoezziHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Building No 2, Eighth Floor, Zand Avenue, Shiraz, 71348-45794, Iran.
Manal EtemadiNIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Kamran Bagheri LankaraniHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Building No 2, Eighth Floor, Zand Avenue, Shiraz, 71348-45794, Iran.
Masoud BehzadifarSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Hamidullah KatebzadaHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Building No 2, Eighth Floor, Zand Avenue, Shiraz, 71348-45794, Iran.
Saeed ShahabiHealth Policy Research Center, Institute of Health, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Building No 2, Eighth Floor, Zand Avenue, Shiraz, 71348-45794, Iran. saeedshahabi1@gmail.com.

Funding

Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran 27912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary health care (PHC) is the most common model for providing primary care, and PHC services are the most common points of care that immigrants and refugees attend as a first step. Most immigrants travel to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet only a few studies have examined their health conditions and their access to PHC in these countries. We have attempted to identify the barriers and facilitators that immigrants and refugees encounter when using PHC in these countries.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, and OpenGrey in this scoping review from its inception to the end of October 2023. Moreover, we manually searched key journals, reference lists, and citations from included studies to identify any missed studies. We extracted data from each selected study using a predefined form. Finally, a thematic analysis approach was utilized to synthesize the collected data from the included qualitative studies.

results17 qualitative studies were included in this review, which were from Iran (n = 3), Brazil (n = 3), Kenya (n = 2), Jordan (n = 2), Eastern Sudan (n = 1), Lebanon (n = 1), Bangladesh (n = 1), India (n = 1), Turkey (n = 1), Thailand (n = 1), and Malaysia (n = 1). Among the most common and important reported barriers are language differences, insufficiency of trained carers, unemployment, inability to pay the costs of hospital and medicines, no insurance coverage for immigrants, no clear referral and care system for immigrants, discrimination against women, and improper residence locations. Insurance coverage, awareness programs, and the study of immigrants' needs, along with their social and financial support from family, are among the most essential facilitators.

conclusionFor LMICs, funding is always a limitation, and increasing PHC utilization is the best choice for improving health. Knowing the challenges and facilitators of PHC utilization from the point of view of each stakeholder is a promising way to decide and make policies that can improve the health of both immigrants and refugees, as well as society as a whole.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEmigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Services AccessibilityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareRefugeesHumansHealthcare utilizationImmigrantsLow- and middle-income countriesPrimary healthcareRefugeesScoping review

Identifiers

PMID39449084
PMCPMC11515291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.