Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449078›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025

Functional quantile principal component analysis.

Álvaro Méndez-Civieta, Ying Wei, Keith M Diaz, Jeff Goldsmith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Álvaro Méndez-CivietaDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, 722W 178 St, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Ying WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, 722W 178 St, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Keith M DiazDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, 161 Fort Washington Ave, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Jeff GoldsmithDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University, 722W 178 St, New York, NY 10032, United States.

Funding

Functional data analytics for kinematic assessments of motor controlR01NS097423 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GOLDSMITH, JEFF · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
NIH HHSNINDS NIH HHS R01 NS097423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces functional quantile principal component analysis (FQPCA), a dimensionality reduction technique that extends the concept of functional principal components analysis (FPCA) to the examination of participant-specific quantiles curves. Our approach borrows strength across participants to estimate patterns in quantiles, and uses participant-level data to estimate loadings on those patterns. As a result, FQPCA is able to capture shifts in the scale and distribution of data that affect participant-level quantile curves, and is also a robust methodology suitable for dealing with outliers, heteroscedastic data or skewed data. The need for such methodology is exemplified by physical activity data collected using wearable devices. Participants often differ in the timing and intensity of physical activity behaviors, and capturing information beyond the participant-level expected value curves produced by FPCA is necessary for a robust quantification of diurnal patterns of activity. We illustrate our methods using accelerometer data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and produce participant-level 10%, 50%, and 90% quantile curves over 24 h of activity. The proposed methodology is supported by simulation results, and is available as an R package.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPrincipal Component AnalysisAccelerometryBiostatisticsData Interpretation, StatisticalExerciseHumansNutrition Surveysaccelerometer datadimension reductionfunctional dataquantile regression

Identifiers

PMID39449078
PMCPMC11823270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.