Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449036›Full record

SynthesisActa veterinaria Scandinavica2024

Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians: a systematic review.

Asbjørn Onsberg Kruuse, Louise Damholt Markusen, Carsten Grøndahl, Lisbeth Høier Olsen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asbjørn Onsberg Kruuse *Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Ridebanevej 9, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Louise Damholt Markusen *Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Ridebanevej 9, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Carsten GrøndahlCentre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Lisbeth Høier OlsenDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Ridebanevej 9, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. lisbeth.hoier@sund.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-3111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians pose unique challenges due to their aggressive nature, poikilothermic physiology, and specific anatomical and physiological characteristics, all factors that complicate crocodilian anaesthesia. This review aimed to systematically review the literature regarding sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians with focus on efficacy and impact on vital parameters. A systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on May 2, 2023 in the databases Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Publications were excluded based on predefined exclusion criteria, which encompassed non-standard publications and publications unrelated to crocodilians, with fewer than five animals and/or with insufficient data on sedation and general anaesthesia. Five key factors were used to evaluate the strength of evidence: number of included animals, study design, definition of recovery time, blinded assessment of recovery and conflict of interest. Ten publications were included in this systematic review. Drugs used included alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonists, dissociative anaesthetics, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blocking agents, propofol, alfaxalone, and inhalant gasses. The studies included in total 55 Alligator mississippiensis, 110 Crocodylus porosus, 15 Crocodylus johnstoni, and 15 Crocodylus niloticus. Factors such as temperature, administration route, dose, species, and age influenced protocols for sedation and general anaesthesia of crocodilians. The studies included used five different study designs. Only one study included a control group, done on retrospectively collected data. Blinded recovery assessments and declarations of no conflict of interest were noted in some studies. The use of four distinct recovery definitions posed challenges to comparability in this systematic review. The studies reported that medetomidine provided stable and reversible sedation, although it depressed heart rate. Alfaxalone was less stable outside the optimal temperature range. Intubation and inhalation anaesthesia were effective, and adrenaline reduced the length of the recovery period. Overall, the review provides valuable insights for veterinarians, researchers, and wildlife professionals involved in sedation and general anaesthesia of the crocodilian species, however, the literature is limited, and further research is needed to improve evidence-based medical management.

Indexed as

Alligators and CrocodilesAnesthesia, GeneralHypnotics and SedativesAnimalsHypnotics and SedativesAlfaxaloneAlligator mississippiensisAlpha-2-adrenoceptor agonistsCrocodylus johnstoniCrocodylus niloticusCrocodylus porosusDissociative anaestheticsInhalation anaesthesiaKetamineRighting reflex

Identifiers

PMID39449036
PMCPMC11520124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.