Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449021›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Using Nobel Prize case-based learning in Medical Immunology to cultivate critical thinking dispositions for medical undergraduates.

Na Li, Chonghao Zhang, Jiaqi Cui, Qing Wang, Tiangang Li, Guiying Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Na Li *Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102401, China.
Chonghao Zhang *Department of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102401, China.
Jiaqi CuiDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102401, China.
Qing WangDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102401, China.
Tiangang LiDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102401, China. Ltgbucm@163.com.
Guiying PengDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102401, China. penggy@bucm.edu.cn.

Funding

Educational Research Foundation of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine XJY22032Educational Research Foundation of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine XJYS21007Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of the National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine ZYYCXTD-C202001Teaching Master workshops of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine MSGZF-202207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical thinking has been regarded as an essential skill for college students, which is especially imperative for medical students to possess the ability to have in-depth insight into complex clinical situations. Medical Immunology is an overarching principle connecting multiple medical subjects, which emphasizes that immunity is both beneficial and harmful to the host, thus putting higher demands on students' critical thinking. The utilization of Nobel Prize stories has been cited as a thematic framework for classroom teaching of other courses, showing numerous educational benefits. Therefore, this study rejuvenated a case-based teaching approach by creating and introducing a vibrant material library centered on numerous iconic Nobel Prize cases in Medical Immunology and evaluating its effects on the critical thinking of medical students.

methodsA total of 70 second-year medical undergraduates from the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine were divided into a control group and an experimental group of 35 cases each. Throughout the semester, the control received the traditional teaching method, and the experimental group adopted case-based teaching based on the Nobel prize-centered material library. The process of teaching design and practice was described using "Antitoxin and immunoserum therapy" as a classical example. A unified assessment of the critical thinking dispositions of participants was conducted at the beginning and end of the semester using the Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version (CTDI-CV).

resultsIntra-group longitudinal comparisons and inter-group parallel evaluations indicated that, compared with the conventional teaching approach, Nobel Prize case-based learning induced a statistically significant increase in the overall score of the CTDI-CV, as well as the scores within the subdimensions of truth-seeking, analyticity, and maturity in judgment (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis further indicated a positive correlation between the total score of the CTDI-CV and the final grade (p < 0.05), which emphasized the crucial role of critical thinking dispositions in academic achievement.

conclusionThe case-based classroom teaching centered on Nobel Prize cases for Medical Immunology can effectively improve the critical thinking dispositions of medical undergraduates, which contributes to cultivating high-level medical and healthcare talents with excellent comprehensive quality in the new era.

Indexed as

Allergy and ImmunologyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateNobel PrizeStudents, MedicalThinkingFemaleHumansMaleProblem-Based LearningYoung AdultCase-based learningCritical thinkingMedical ImmunologyMedical studentsNobel PrizeTeaching reform

Identifiers

PMID39449021
PMCPMC11520106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.