Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449018›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2024

National school food standards in England: a cross-sectional study to explore compliance in secondary schools and impact on pupil nutritional intake.

Miranda Pallan, Marie Murphy, Breanna Morrison, Alice Sitch, Ashley Adamson, Suzanne Bartington, Alexandra Dobell, Rhona Duff, Emma Frew, Tania Griffin and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Evaluation of school food policies for secondary schools in Europe: Results for health, acceptance, and affordability from a scoping review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Miranda PallanDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. m.j.pallan@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2868-4892
Marie MurphyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Breanna MorrisonDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Alice SitchDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Ashley AdamsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, M1.151 William Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Suzanne BartingtonDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Alexandra DobellDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Rhona DuffDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Emma FrewDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Tania GriffinDepartment for Health, University of Bath, 1 West, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Kiya HurleyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Emma LancashireDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Louise McLemanDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Sandra PassmoreServices for Education, Unit 3 Holt Court, Holt Street, Birmingham, B7 4AX, UK.
Irina PokhilenkoDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Maisie RowlandPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, M1.151 William Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Vahid RavaghiThe School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, 5 Mill Pool Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B5 7EG, UK.
Suzanne SpencePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, M1.151 William Leech Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Peymane AdabDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, Murray learning Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

Public Health Research Programme 17/92/39
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries have introduced school food standards to improve the dietary intakes of school-aged children. England has school food standards (SFS) legislation in place but little is known about how well secondary schools comply with this. We aimed to assess compliance with the SFS legislation in English secondary schools and explore the impact of the SFS on pupils' nutritional intake.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study with English secondary schools from 2019 to 2022. We compared SFS compliance and pupil nutritional intake in schools mandated or not mandated to comply with the SFS legislation, and explored the association between school compliance and pupil nutritional intake. We assessed the percentage of SFS (%SFS) complied with by reviewing school food menus and observing food served in school canteens. We assessed pupil nutritional intake using a 24-hour dietary recall measure (Intake24) and estimated intakes of free sugar (primary outcome) and other nutrients/foods. We used adjusted multilevel models to compare pupil intakes in the SFS-mandated and SFS-non-mandated schools, and to explore the association between school SFS compliance and pupil intakes.

results36 schools (23 not mandated and 13 mandated to comply with the SFS) and 2,273 pupils participated. The median %SFS complied with was 63.9% (interquartile range 60.0-70.0%). This was similar for SFS-non-mandated (64.5%) and SFS-mandated schools (63.3%). Compliance was highest for standards applying to lunchtime (median = 81.3%) and lowest for those applying across the whole school day (median = 41.7%). It was also lower for standards restricting high fat, sugar and energy-dense items (median = 26.1%) than for standards aiming to increase dietary variety (median = 92.3%). Pupils from SFS-mandated schools had a lower mean lunchtime intake of free sugar (g) (adjusted mean difference: -2.78g; 95% CI: -4.66g to -0.90g). There were few significant associations between %SFS complied with and pupil nutritional intake.

conclusionsEnglish secondary schools do not fully comply with SFS legislation regardless of whether they are mandated to comply. Schools and caterers may require monitoring and support to fully comply. There is little evidence that SFS compliance is associated with better pupil nutritional intake. Food environments outside of school also need to be considered. STUDY REGISTRATION: ISRCTN68757496 (17-10-2019).

Indexed as

Food ServicesNutrition PolicySchoolsStudentsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesDietEnergy IntakeEnglandFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleNutritive ValueAdolescentsFoodNutritionSchools

Identifiers

PMID39449018
PMCPMC11515374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.