ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Characteristics of the fundus and optical coherence tomography angiography metrics in myopic patients with myelinated retinal nerve fibers.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A 9-Year-Old Boy With Strabismus, Anisometropic Amblyopia, and Myopia in the Left Eye, Associated With Myelinated Retinal Nerve Fibers Syndrome, Managed With Multimodal Therapy.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo investigate the fundus characteristics and macular optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) metrics in patients with myelinated retinal nerve fibers (MRNF) and to identify the associations among myopic parameters, fundus metrics, and OCTA metrics.
methodsThe single-center case-control study included 15 patients with monocular MRNF and 15 patients without MRNF, matched for age, affected eyes' spherical equivalent error (SER), and axial length (AL) between May 2021 and December 2021. Fundus features, including the entire MRNF area (Area1), the denser MRNF area (Area2), and the shortest distance from the fovea to the MRNF border (D
resultsThe SER, AL, and BCVA were significantly different, and the ChT was thinner in the affected eyes than in the contralateral eyes. Compared with matched eyes, affected eyes had reduced BCVA and thinner ReT. In the affected eyes, both Area1 and Area2 were negatively correlated with SER (r
conclusionThe presence of MRNF affects BCVA and ReT at the fovea. The area of the MRNF, as well as the distance from the MRNF to the fovea, are closely associated with the affected eyes' BCVA, SER, AL, and the degree of anisometropia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.