Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448963›Full record

SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2024

Risk of Clostridioides difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease patients undergoing vedolizumab treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wei Chen, Yuhang Liu, Yuelun Zhang, Hong Zhang, Chuyan Chen, Siying Zhu, Yanhua Zhou, Haiying Zhao, Ye Zong

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical characteristics and risk factors analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomedicines · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Global Patterns ofCrohn's & colitis 360 · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wei Chen *Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- cheng District, Beijing, China.
Yuhang Liu *Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- cheng District, Beijing, China.
Yuelun ZhangInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hong ZhangWenzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital Pharmacy Department, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chuyan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- cheng District, Beijing, China.
Siying ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- cheng District, Beijing, China.
Yanhua ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- cheng District, Beijing, China.
Haiying ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- cheng District, Beijing, China.
Ye ZongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Disease, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong-an Road, Xi- cheng District, Beijing, China. zongye@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Friendship Hospital YYZZ202215National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFC2507300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, relapsing condition wherein biologics have improved disease prognosis but introduced elevated infection susceptibility. Vedolizumab (VDZ) demonstrates unique safety advantages; however, a comprehensive systematic comparison regarding the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) between vedolizumab and alternative medications remains absent.

methodMedline, Embase, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov registry were comprehensively searched. Pooled estimates of CDI proportion, incidence, pooled risk ratio between ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), vedolizumab and other medications were calculated. Data synthesis was completed in R using the package "meta".

resultsOf the 338 studies initially identified, 30 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. For CDI risk, the pooled proportion was 0.013 (95% CI 0.010-0.017), as well as the pooled proportion of serious CDI was 0.004 (95% CI 0.002-0.008). The comparative pooled risk ratios revealed: UC versus CD at 2.25 (95% CI 1.73-2.92), vedolizumab versus anti-TNF agents at 0.15 (95% CI 0.04-0.63) for UC and 1.29 (95% CI 0.41-4.04) for CD.

conclusionThe overall CDI risk in IBD patients exposed to vedolizumab was estimated to be 0.013. An increased risk of CDI was noted in UC patients receiving vedolizumab compared to those with CD. Vedolizumab potentially offers an advantage over anti-TNF agents for UC regarding CDI risk, but not for CD.

trial registrationThe study was registered on the PROSPERO registry (CRD42023465986).

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedClostridium InfectionsGastrointestinal AgentsClostridioides difficileColitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseHumansIncidenceAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGastrointestinal AgentsvedolizumabClostridioides difficile infectionInflammatory bowel diseaseSystematic reviewVedolizumab

Identifiers

PMID39448963
PMCPMC11515399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.