ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
How does the position of the pelvis and femur influence the selection of prosthesis size during 2D preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty?
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven 3D virtual surgical planning in total hip arthroplasty: a machine learning approach for precision implant positioning and improved clinical outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTotal Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is the primary treatment for hip diseases today. Nevertheless, total hip arthroplasty has its challenges, and one of these challenges is the potential for incorrect execution of the preoperative planning process. Such errors can lead to complications such as loosening and instability of the prosthesis and leg length discrepancy. In this study, we used human phantoms to investigate the influence of pelvic and femoral factors on prosthesis size selection in the preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty and to provide a reference standard for clinical imaging in preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty.
methodsIn this experiment, we utilised a custom-made experimental device that enabled us to manipulate the movement of the pelvis and femur in various directions. The device also incorporated sensors to control the angle of movement. By obtaining X-rays from different positions and angles, we were able to determine the size of the prosthesis based on the 2D preoperative planning generated by the mediCAD software.
resultsWhen the pelvis was in a nonneutral position, the size of the acetabular cup varied within a range of three sizes. Similarly, when the femur was in a nonneutral position, the size of the femoral stem varied within a range of two sizes. The movement of the pelvis and femur in the coronal plane, relative to the neutral position, did not impact the selection of the prosthesis size. However, the motion of the pelvis and femur in the sagittal and transverse planes had a notable effect.
conclusionThe selection of the prosthesis size for preoperative planning can be significantly influenced by specific positions of the pelvis and femur. It is crucial for the radiographer to ensure that the pelvis and femur maintain a standard neutral position, particularly in the sagittal and transverse planes, during the image acquisition process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.