Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Epidemiology of bronchiectasis at a single center in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-infection withFrontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Long-Term Macrolides in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: Dusk or a New Dawn? A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe characteristics of bronchiectasis (BE) in Asia, including Japan, remain largely unknown. We aimed to provide insights into the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of BE, especially regarding nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection and its poorly understood impact on prognosis. We also aimed to clarify the effect of long-term macrolide antibiotic use in patients with BE, who had no history of exacerbations.
methodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, the medical records of patients who satisfied the BE criteria between January 1, 2012, and August 31, 2023, were reviewed. Severe exacerbations and mortality during the observation period were recorded. Baseline characteristics and overall survival of patients with and without NTM infection, and factors influencing the time to the first exacerbation and death were analyzed. Additionally, the effects of long-term macrolide antibiotic use in patients without a history of severe exacerbations were estimated.
resultsIn a cohort of 1044 patients with BE, the rate of severe exacerbation was 22.3%, with mortality rates of 3.2% over 3 years. Notably, the high prevalence of NTM infection (n = 410, 39.3%) in this cohort was distinctive. NTM infection was not associated with either the time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.5676, adjusted hazard ratio = 1.11) or mortality (p = 0.4139, adjusted hazard ratio = 0.78). Compared with the NTM group, the non-NTM group had a higher proportion of elevated inflammatory markers, with significant differences in C-reactive protein levels (p = 0.0301) and blood neutrophil counts (p = 0.0273). Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization was more frequent in the non-NTM group (p = 0.0003). Among patients with non-NTM infection and without a history of exacerbation in the past 2 years, 38.2% received long-term macrolide antibiotics that did not invariably prolong the time to first severe exacerbation (p = 0.4517, IPW p = 0.3555).
conclusionsThis study highlights BE epidemiology in Japan, noting that the presence of NTM infection may not necessarily worsen the prognostic outcomes and advising caution in the casual use of macrolides for milder cases without a history of exacerbations. CLINICAL
trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number: UMIN000054726 (Registered on 21 June 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.