ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Data-driven discovery of chemotactic migration of bacteria via coordinate-invariant machine learning.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From disorganized data to emergent dynamic models: Questionnaires to partial differential equations.PNAS nexus · 2025Article
- Direct measurement of dynamic attractant gradients reveals breakdown of the Patlak-Keller-Segel chemotaxis model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundE. coli chemotactic motion in the presence of a chemonutrient field can be studied using wet laboratory experiments or macroscale-level partial differential equations (PDEs) (among others). Bridging experimental measurements and chemotactic Partial Differential Equations requires knowledge of the evolution of all underlying fields, initial and boundary conditions, and often necessitates strong assumptions. In this work, we propose machine learning approaches, along with ideas from the Whitney and Takens embedding theorems, to circumvent these challenges.
resultsMachine learning approaches for identifying underlying PDEs were (a) validated through the use of simulation data from established continuum models and (b) used to infer chemotactic PDEs from experimental data. Such data-driven models were surrogates either for the entire chemotactic PDE right-hand-side (black box models), or, in a more targeted fashion, just for the chemotactic term (gray box models). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that a short history of bacterial density may compensate for the missing measurements of the field of chemonutrient concentration. In fact, given reasonable conditions, such a short history of bacterial density measurements could even be used to infer chemonutrient concentration.
conclusionData-driven PDEs are an important modeling tool when studying Chemotaxis at the macroscale, as they can learn bacterial motility from various data sources, fidelities (here, computational models, experiments) or coordinate systems. The resulting data-driven PDEs can then be simulated to reproduce/predict computational or experimental bacterial density profile data independent of the coordinate system, approximate meaningful parameters or functional terms, and even possibly estimate the underlying (unmeasured) chemonutrient field evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.