ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024
LLpowershap: logistic loss-based automated Shapley values feature selection method.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- InterFeat: a pipeline for finding interesting scientific features.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Feature Selection Methods and Prediction Models for Flowering Time Prediction in Maize.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundShapley values have been used extensively in machine learning, not only to explain black box machine learning models, but among other tasks, also to conduct model debugging, sensitivity and fairness analyses and to select important features for robust modelling and for further follow-up analyses. Shapley values satisfy certain axioms that promote fairness in distributing contributions of features toward prediction or reducing error, after accounting for non-linear relationships and interactions when complex machine learning models are employed. Recently, feature selection methods using predictive Shapley values and p-values have been introduced, including powershap.
methodsWe present a novel feature selection method, LLpowershap, that takes forward these recent advances by employing loss-based Shapley values to identify informative features with minimal noise among the selected sets of features. We also enhance the calculation of p-values and power to identify informative features and to estimate number of iterations of model development and testing.
resultsOur simulation results show that LLpowershap not only identifies higher number of informative features but outputs fewer noise features compared to other state-of-the-art feature selection methods. Benchmarking results on four real-world datasets demonstrate higher or comparable predictive performance of LLpowershap compared to other Shapley based wrapper methods, or filter methods. LLpowershap is also ranked the best in mean ranking among the seven feature selection methods tested on the benchmark datasets.
conclusionOur results demonstrate that LLpowershap is a viable wrapper feature selection method that can be used for feature selection in large biomedical datasets and other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.