ArticleScientific reports2024
Visual and ocular surface benefits of mini-scleral contact lenses in patients with chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (GvHD).
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Graft-Versus-Host Disease at a Tertiary Cancer Center.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Amniotic Membrane-Assisted Corneal Transplantation in Ocular Perforation Due to GVHD: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Contact Lenses and Vision-Related Quality of Life: Evidence and Clinical Insights.Clinical optometry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Graft-versus-Host disease is a major complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The eyes are a frequently affected organ with a severe dry eye disease being the hallmark manifestation. This retrospective study evaluates the effect of mini-scleral contact lenses on visual acuity, eye-related quality of life and the ocular surface. 62 eyes of 31 patients were included and visual acuity, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire results and Oxford grades before and after mini-scleral lens fitting were compared. Median Snellen fraction with mini-scleral lenses was 20/25 (1st 20/30/3rd 20/20) compared to 20/40 median Snellen fraction with spectacles (1st 20/60/3rd 20/25). Median OSDI scores improved from 73 (1st 41.6/3rd 89) before fitting to 27 (1st 14.5/3rd 56) with mini-scleral lenses. Median Oxford grade decreased from 3 before mini-scleral lens fitting (1st 1/3rd 4.75) to 1 after mini-scleral lens fitting (1st 0/3rd 4). Median time of follow up was 717.5 days. Seven patients (22.6%) discontinued therapy with mini-scleral lenses. Mini-scleral lenses are beneficial for most patients with ocular GvHD as they improve visual acuity, eye-related quality of life and the integrity of the corneal epithelium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.