ArticleScientific reports2024
Experimental study of polymeric composite reinforced with carbon fiber for mud lost control application.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synthesis of Amorphous Graphene and Graphene Oxide Analogues.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a novel application of composite materials as Lost Circulation Materials (LCM), leveraging their high specific strength, non-abrasiveness, and environmentally friendly profile. A new formulation of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) composites was developed using an advanced twin-screw extrusion process followed by compression molding. Their efficacy in sealing fractures was quantitatively assessed in accordance with American Petroleum Institute (API) standards using a Bridging Material Tester (BMT). Comparative analysis with previous studies on Bagasse Fiber Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) composites was conducted. Interfacial interactions and fracture morphology were examined through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), revealing the CFRP composites' superior resistance to water absorption. The moisture absorption tests indicated that the CFRP absorbed 0.7% moisture after 24 h, compared to 15% for BFRP, suggesting enhanced durability in wet conditions. However, despite their robust mechanical properties, they exhibited lower fracture-sealing efficiency compared to BFRP composites. These findings not only underscore the potential of composite-based LCMs in enhancing drilling safety but also guide future research toward optimizing composite formulations for more effective field applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.