ArticleScientific reports2024
Efficient feature selection for histopathological image classification with improved multi-objective WOA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Semi-Quantitative Detection of Borax Adulteration in Wheat Flour Based on Microwave Non-Destructive Testing and Machine Learning.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The difficulty of selecting features efficiently in histopathology image analysis remains unresolved. Furthermore, the majority of current approaches have approached feature selection as a single objective issue. This research presents an enhanced multi-objective whale optimisation algorithm-based feature selection technique as a solution. To mine optimal feature sets, the suggested technique makes use of a unique variation known as the enhanced multi-objective whale optimisation algorithm. To verify the optimisation capability, the suggested variation has been evaluated on 10 common multi-objective CEC2009 benchmark functions. Furthermore, by comparing five classifiers in terms of accuracy, mean number of selected features, and calculation time, the effectiveness of the suggested strategy is verified against three other feature-selection techniques already in use. The experimental findings show that, when compared to the other approaches under consideration, the suggested method performed better on the assessed parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.