ArticleScientific reports2024
A refined TTC assay precisely detects cardiac injury and cellular viability in the infarcted mouse heart.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic microRNA Signatures as Biomarkers for Cardiac Ischemia and Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- TargetedImmunotherapy advances · 2026Review
- A cost-effective proof-of-conceptFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- An immunostaining-based approach for assessing myocardial viability in the infarcted mouse hearts.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Heat shock protein 90 mediates the protective effects of vericiguat on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting toll-like receptor 4 and c-Jun N-terminal kinases.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histological analysis with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining is the most frequently used tool to detect myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. However, its practicality is often challenged by poor image quality in gross histology, leading to an equivocal infarct-boundary delineation and potentially compromised measurement accuracy. Here, we introduce several crucial refinements in staining protocol and sample processing, which enable TTC images to be analyzed with light microscopy. The refined protocol involves a two-step TTC staining process (perfusion and immersion) and subsequent Zamboni fixation to differentiate myocardial viability and necrosis, and use of Coomassie brilliant blue to label area-at-risk. After the duo-staining steps were completed, the heart sample was embedded and sliced transversally by a cryostat into a series of thin sections (50 µm) for microscopic analysis. The refined TTC (redTTC) assay yielded remarkably high-quality images with striking color intensity and sharply defined boundaries, permitting unambiguous and reliable delineation of the infarct and area-at-risk. In the same animals, the redTTC assay showed good agreement with the in-vivo gold standard measurements (LGE and MEMRI). Meanwhile, redTTC imaging allows tracking of viable cardiomyocytes at cellular resolution, and with this enhanced capability, we convincingly demonstrated the pro-survival action of stem cells based-therapy. Therefore, the redTTC assay represents a significant technical advance that permits precise detection of the true extent of cardiac injury and cardiomyocyte viability. This approach is cost-effective and may be adapted for use in diverse applications, making it highly appealing to many laboratories performing ischemia/reperfusion injury experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.