ArticleScientific reports2024
Identification of diagnostic challenges in RP1 Alu insertion and strategies for overcoming them.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Stratified Genetic Spectrum of Retinitis Pigmentosa in Korean Patients: Predominance ofAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Real-world evaluation of gnomAD variant co-occurrence information for haplotype phasing in autosomal recessive disorders.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Lessons from national biobank projects utilizing whole-genome sequencing for population-scale genomics.Genomics & informatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recently, a founder Alu insertion in exon 4 of RP1 was detected in Japanese and Korean patients with inherited retinal diseases (IRDs). However, carrier frequency and diagnostic challenges for detecting AluY insertion are not established. We aim to investigate the frequency of AluY in individuals with or without IRDs and to overcome common diagnostic pitfalls associated with AluY insertion. A total of 1,072 subjects comprising 411 patients with IRD (IRD group) and 661 patients with other suspected Mendelian genetic disease (non-IRD group) was screened for AluY insertion. Targeted panel sequencing and whole-genome sequencing were used for detection of AluY insertion, and an optimized allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) was used for validation. The AluY insertion was detected in 1.5% in IRD group (6/411). The AluY insertion was not observed in non-IRD group (0/661). All patients with AluY were confirmed to have RP1 pathogenic variants on the paired allele. We identified AluY allele dropout leading to false homozygosity for c.4196del pathogenic variant in Sanger sequencing. The allelic relationship between variants of RP1 was accurately determined by AluY AS-PCR. Delineating diagnostic challenges of AluY insertion and strategies to avoid potential pitfalls could aid clinicians in an accurate molecular diagnosis for patients with IRD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.