ArticleScientific reports2024
Phishing URL detection with neural networks: an empirical study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adversarial-resilient lightweight phishing url detection: Evaluating lexical & metadata features under evasion techniques.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An entropy-guided hybrid framework for real-time phishing detection in digital communication systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cybercriminals create phishing websites that mimic legitimate websites to get sensitive information from companies, individuals, or governments. Therefore, using state-of-the-art artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies to correctly classify phishing and legitimate URLs is imperative. We report the results of applying deterministic and probabilistic neural network models to URL classification. Key achievements of this work are: (1) The development of a unique approach based on probabilistic neural networks that improves classification accuracy. (2) We show for the first time in URL phishing research that a machine learning model trained on a combination of open source and private datasets is successful in production. The dataset is constructed from open sources like Alexa, PhishTank, or OpenPhish and, most importantly, real-world production data from EasyDMARC. The daily validation of the model using daily reported URL data and corresponding labels, both from open-source platforms and private production, reach on average a 97% accuracy on the validation dataset, labeled by PhishTank, OpenPhish and EasdDMARC where possible mislabeled data can not be excluded and was not possible to check due to large number of URLs. Feature engineering was done without third-party dependencies. Lastly, the evaluation of both deterministic and probabilistic models shows high accuracy on short and long URLs, where short URLs are defined as having less than 50 characters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.