Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448659›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Augmented reality guidance improves accuracy of orthopedic drilling procedures.

Frederick Van Gestel, Fiene Van Aerschot, Taylor Frantz, Anouk Verhellen, Kurt Barbé, Bart Jansen, Jef Vandemeulebroucke, Johnny Duerinck, Thierry Scheerlinck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frederick Van GestelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. frederick.vangestel@uzbrussel.be.ORCID 0000-0001-6444-6632
Fiene Van AerschotDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Taylor FrantzDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 9, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Anouk Verhellenimec, Kapeldreef 75, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
Kurt BarbéDepartment of Public Health, Research Group Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (BISI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Bart JansenDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 9, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Jef VandemeulebrouckeDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 9, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Johnny DuerinckDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry ScheerlinckDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In several orthopedic procedures, the accurate use of surgical power tools is critical to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. As such, various guidance techniques and safety measures were developed. Augmented reality (AR) guidance shows promise but requires validation. We evaluated a new approach using an inside-out infrared tracking solution for the HoloLens to compensate for its limited tracking performance. Eighteen participants with varying levels of experience (student, trainee, expert) each drilled twelve trajectories (six perpendicular, six oblique) in equidimensional wooden logs. Three different techniques were evaluated: freehand drilling; proprioception-guided drilling towards the contralateral index finger; and AR-guided drilling using a tracked drill and a virtual overlay of the log with predefined guidance vectors. The angular errors between planned and performed trajectories were compared using a mixed-design ANOVA. The results demonstrated that guidance technique (p < 0.001) and drilling direction (p < 0.001) significantly affected drilling accuracy, while experience (p = 0.75) did not. AR outperformed both other techniques, particularly for oblique trajectories (p < 0.001). For perpendicular trajectories, it only outperformed proprioception guidance (p = 0.04). Target plots revealed an important scatter perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the log during freehand and proprioception-guided drilling, especially for oblique trajectories. This inaccuracy disappeared during AR-guided drilling. As such, we were able to conclude that AR guidance using inside-out infrared tracking reduced angular uncertainty during directional drilling, resulting in improved drilling accuracy. This improvement was particularly noticeable for complex trajectories and angles. The benefits of AR guidance were observed across all experience levels, highlighting its potential for orthopedic applications. We believe this study opens the way for the methodical evaluation of AR guidance in specific orthopedic use cases.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityOrthopedic ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansMaleSurgery, Computer-AssistedAugmented realityComputer-assisted surgeryHoloLensNavigationOrthopedic drilling

Identifiers

PMID39448659
PMCPMC11502681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.