Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448652›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning-based improved transformer model on android malware detection and classification in internet of vehicles.

Naif Almakayeel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Naif AlmakayeelDepartment of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Khalid University, 61421, Abha, Saudi Arabia. halmakaeel@kku.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing popularity of autonomous vehicles (AVs), confirming their safety has become a significant concern. Vehicle manufacturers have combined the Android operating system into AVs to improve consumer comfort. However, the diversity and weaknesses of the Android operating system pose substantial safety risks to AVs, as these factors can expose them to threats, namely Android malware. The advanced behaviour of multi-data source fusion in autonomous driving models has mitigated recognition accuracy and effectualness for Android malware. To efficiently counter new malware variants, novel techniques distinct from conventional methods must be utilized. Machine learning (ML) techniques cannot detect every new and complex malware variant. The deep learning (DL) model is an efficient tool for detecting various malware variants. This manuscript proposes a Deep Learning-Based Improved Transformer Model on Android Malware Detection (DLBITM-AMD) technique for Internet vehicles (IoVs). The main aim of the presented DLBITM-AMD approach is to detect Android malware effectually and accurately. The DLBITM-AMD method performs a Z-score normalization process to convert the raw data into a standard form. Then, the DLBITM-AMD approach utilizes the binary grey wolf optimization (BGWO) model to select optimum feature subsets. An improved transformer is integrated with the RNN model and softmax to enhance classification for Android malware recognition. Finally, the snake optimizer algorithm (SOA) method is employed to select the optimum parameter for the classification method. An extensive experiment of the DLBITM-AMD method is accomplished on a benchmark dataset. The performance validation of the DLBITM-AMD technique portrayed a superior accuracy value of 99.26% over existing Android malware recognition models.

Indexed as

Android malware detectionDeep learningInternet of vehiclesSnake optimizer algorithmSoftmax

Identifiers

PMID39448652
PMCPMC11502773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.