Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448646›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhancing transparency and fairness in automated credit decisions: an explainable novel hybrid machine learning approach.

Chioma Ngozi Nwafor, Obumneme Nwafor, Sanjukta Brahma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chioma Ngozi NwaforGlasgow School for Business and Society, Department of Finance, Accountancy and Risk, Glasgow Caledonia University, Glasgow, Scotland. Chioma.Nwafor@gcu.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9612-7214
Obumneme NwaforSchool of Computing, Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0993-1659
Sanjukta BrahmaGlasgow School for Business and Society, Department of Finance, Accountancy and Risk, Glasgow Caledonia University, Glasgow, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0372-9644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper uses a generalised stacking method to introduce a novel hybrid model that combines a one-dimensional convolutional neural network 1DCNN with extreme gradient boosting XGBoost. We compared the predictive accuracies of the proposed hybrid architecture with three conventional algorithms-1DCNN, XGBoost and logistic regression (LR) using a dataset of over twenty thousand peer-to-peer (P2P) consumer credit observations. By leveraging the SHAP algorithm, the research provides a detailed analysis of feature importance, contributing to the model's predictions and offering insights into the overall and individual significance of different features. The findings demonstrate that the hybrid model outperforms the LR, XGBoost and 1DCNN models in terms of classification accuracy. Furthermore, the research addresses concern regarding fairness and bias by showing that removing potentially discriminatory features, such as age and gender, does not significantly impact the hybrid model's classification capabilities. This suggests that fair and unbiased credit scoring models can achieve high effectiveness levels without compromising accuracy. This paper makes significant contributions to academic research and practical applications in credit risk management by presenting a hybrid model that offers superior classification accuracy and promotes interpretability using the model agnostic SHAP framework.

Indexed as

And Logistics regressionCredit riskExplainable artificial intelligenceOne-dimensional convolutional neural networkShapley Additive explanation

Identifiers

PMID39448646
PMCPMC11502870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.