Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448619›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Experimental evidence on the role of framing, difficulty and domain-similarity in shaping behavioral spillovers.

Anja Köbrich León, Julien Picard, Janosch Schobin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anja Köbrich LeónInstitute of Economics, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany. anja.koebrich@uni-kassel.de.
Julien PicardDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milan, Italy. julienroger.picard@polimi.it.
Janosch SchobinInstitute of Economics, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Does prompting people to volunteer for the climate spur or hamper further environmental engagement? We address this question in an online experiment with 10,670 German respondents. First, respondents read a text explaining how to help scientists fight climate change. Second, participants choose whether to do a real-effort task, like the behavior emphasized in the text. Third, respondents can sign a petition against climate change. In Study 1, we manipulate the narrative of the texts. We compare narratives condemning inaction or praising climate action against a neutral narrative (control) and an unrelated article (placebo). In Study 2, we investigate how the difficulty of the first behavior moderates behavioral spillovers. In Study 3, we test if the similarity between the domains of the two behaviors (e.g., environment, health) moderates spillover effects. None of our narratives increase the uptake of the real-effort task. Doing the real-effort task does not increase the likelihood of signing the petition either. Difficulty and domain-similarity do not moderate these effects.Protocol registration The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on January 1, 2023. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JPT8G .

Indexed as

Climate ChangeAdultBehaviorFemaleGermanyHumansMaleNarration

Identifiers

PMID39448619
PMCPMC11502804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.