ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced VOCs adsorption with UIO-66-porous carbon nanohybrid from mesquite grain: A combined experimental and computational study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of Emerging Strategies and Progress in Transition Metal-Modified Activated Carbons for Hazardous Gas Elimination.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Synthesis and characterization of trimetallic (CuNiZn-PDC) MOF for the effective remediation of Rhodamine B dye.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Impact of carbon content on the adsorptive performance of Zr-MOF composites for diclofenac sodium removal.RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, adsorption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (here just gasoline vapor) by activated carbon- modified UIO-66 was investigated. First, activated carbon prepared from mesquite grain (ACPMG) and then UIO/ACPMG nanohybrid was synthesized by the solvothermal method. In following, the effect of main key parameters which effect on the surface and adsorption capacity such as the ratio of ACPMG to UIO-66 was studied. Physiochemical changes of as- synthesized samples were investigated by TGA, HR-TEM, PSD, SEM, EDX/MAP, BET, FT-IR, XRD, and XPS. It was found the UIO/ACPMG20% nanohybrid had the highest adsorption capacity (391.304 mg/g) for VOCs compared with the other samples, while the adsorption capacity of UIO-66, UIO/ACPMG10% nanohybrid, and UIO/ACPMG30% nanohybrid was 298.871, 309.523, and 320 mg/g respectively. UIO/ACPMG20% nanohybrid desorbed 285.71 mg/g of the adsorbed gasoline, which is an excellent result in desorption. So, the sample of UIO/ACPMG20% nanohybrid was selected as the optimum nano-adsorbent. In other hand, all the nano-adsorbent showed a rapid kinetic behavior for gasoline vapor adsorption and the maximum time for reaching a high adsorption capacity approximately was obtained in 20 min. Density functional theory calculations also performed to understand the adsorption characteristics of gasoline vapor on activated carbon-modified UIO-66.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.