ArticleNature communications2024
Deep learning resilience inference for complex networked systems.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A small set of critical hyper-motifs governs heterogeneous flow-weighted network resilience.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A forewarning model for the reverse supply chain of urban End-of-Life power batteries based on a mix method of BWM and RBFNN.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A physics-informed and data-driven framework for robotic welding in manufacturing.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A community public health emergency resilience assessment framework based on contrastive learning and hyperbolic embedding.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Deep learning resilience inference for complex networked systems.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Resilience, the ability to maintain fundamental functionality amidst failures and errors, is crucial for complex networked systems. Most analytical approaches rely on predefined equations for node activity dynamics and simplifying assumptions on network topology, limiting their applicability to real-world systems. Here, we propose ResInf, a deep learning framework integrating transformers and graph neural networks to infer resilience directly from observational data. ResInf learns representations of node activity dynamics and network topology without simplifying assumptions, enabling accurate resilience inference and low-dimensional visualization. Experimental results show that ResInf significantly outperforms analytical methods, with an F1-score improvement of up to 41.59% over Gao-Barzel-Barabási framework and 14.32% over spectral dimension reduction. It also generalizes to unseen topologies and dynamics and maintains robust performance despite observational disturbances. Our findings suggest that ResInf addresses an important gap in resilience inference for real-world systems, offering a fresh perspective on incorporating data-driven approaches to complex network modeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.