ArticleClinical rheumatology2024
Increased risk of adverse events among patients with vs. without systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease prescribed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSystemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) patients have been excluded from sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) trials given putative risks, but this risk magnitude is unknown. We aimed to quantify SGLT2i adverse event risks among patients with vs. without SARD.
methodsIn a retrospective cohort study, patients with SARD at Mass General Brigham, a multihospital system in Boston, Massachusetts, prescribed SGLT2i were age-, self-reported race-, and sex-matched to patients prescribed the same SGLT2i between 1/1/2016 and 12/10/2021. Cumulative incidence and Cox models, overall and sex-stratified, estimated patient-reported adverse event risks from prescription date, censoring for discontinuation, death, or study end (12/12/2022).
resultsFour hundred sixty-eight SARD and 420 matched non-SARD patients were compared: mean age 64 years (SD 11.3), 61% female, and 70% White. SARD patients had shorter SGLT2i use duration (8.4 vs. 12.7 months; p < 0.0001) and time to adverse event (0.59 vs. 0.85 years; p 0.04). Yeast infections (9.8% vs. 6.2%; p 0.047) and muscular symptoms (3.4% vs. 1.0%, p 0.01) were more prevalent among those with SARD. Adjusting for baseline demographics, adverse event risk was higher (MV HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.28, 2.21), in patients with vs. without SARD. Risk was higher in women than men overall and in women with SARD vs. without (adjusted HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.36, 2.54).
conclusionPatients with vs. without SARD had 68% higher adverse event risk with SGLT2i use. Women with vs. without SARD had > 85% higher adverse event risks, although most were not serious. Trials of safety and efficacy of SGLT2i among SARD patients are warranted. Key Points •To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare adverse events associated with SGLT2i utilization in patients with vs. without SARD, despite RCT exclusion and documented SGLT2i use in the population. •In our comparison of 468 patients with SARD and 420 patients without, we identified a greater than 65% increase in risk of adverse event outcomes among patients with SARD. •Furthermore, we found that this risk disproportionately affected female patients, with a 4.4-fold increased risk among women with SARD compared to men without.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.