Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448462›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

Tooth numbering with polygonal segmentation on periapical radiographs: an artificial intelligence study.

Halil Ayyıldız, Mukadder Orhan, Elif Bilgir, Özer Çelik, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Halil AyyıldızDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Science University, Kutahya, Türkiye. hayyil2@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8633-1764
Mukadder OrhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Beykent University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0770-8904
Elif BilgirDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9521-4682
Özer ÇelikDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Faculty of Science, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-3101
İbrahim Şevki BayrakdarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskisehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5036-9867

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAccurately identification and tooth numbering on radiographs is essential for any clinicians. The aim of the present study was to validate the hypothesis that Yolov5, a type of artificial intelligence model, can be trained to detect and number teeth in periapical radiographs. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix thousand four hundred forty six anonymized periapical radiographs without motion-related artifacts were randomly selected from the database. All periapical radiographs in which all boundaries of any tooth could be distinguished were included in the study. The radiographic images used were randomly divided into three groups: 80% training, 10% validation, and 10% testing. The confusion matrix was used to examine model success.

resultsDuring the test phase, 2578 labelings were performed on 644 periapical radiographs. The number of true positive was 2434 (94.4%), false positive was 115 (4.4%), and false negative was 29 (1.2%). The recall, precision, and F1 scores were 0.9882, 0.9548, and 0.9712, respectively. Moreover, the model yielded an area under curve (AUC) of 0.603 on the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

conclusionsThis study showed us that YOLOv5 is nearly perfect for numbering teeth on periapical radiography. Although high success rates were achieved as a result of the study, it should not be forgotten that artificial intelligence currently only can be guides dentists for accurate and rapid diagnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: It is thought that dentists can accelerate the radiographic examination time and inexperienced dentists can reduce the error rate by using YOLOv5. Additionally, YOLOv5 can also be used in the education of dentistry students.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHumansRadiography, DentalToothArtificial intelligenceDeep learningPeriapical radiographyPolygonal segmentationTooth numbering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.