Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448448›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025

Isolation, Potential Beneficial Properties, and Assessment of Storage Stability of Direct-Fed Microbial Consortia from Wild-Type Chicken Intestine.

Haiku D J Gómez-Velázquez, Pamela Peña-Medellín, Carlos O Guzmán-Hernández, Laura González-Dávalos, Alfredo Varela-Echavarría, Armando Shimada, Ofelia Mora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haiku D J Gómez-Velázquez *Laboratorio de Rumiología y Metabolismo Nutricional (RuMeN), Facultad de Estudios Superiores-Cuautitlán (FESC), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 76231, Querétaro, Qro, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-6603
Pamela Peña-Medellín *Posgrado en Ciencias de La Producción y La Salud Animal, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carlos O Guzmán-HernándezPosgrado en Ciencias de La Producción y La Salud Animal, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura González-DávalosLaboratorio de Rumiología y Metabolismo Nutricional (RuMeN), Facultad de Estudios Superiores-Cuautitlán (FESC), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 76231, Querétaro, Qro, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-1773
Alfredo Varela-EchavarríaInstituto de Neurobiología, UNAM, 76231, Querétaro, Qro, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2597-8318
Armando ShimadaLaboratorio de Rumiología y Metabolismo Nutricional (RuMeN), Facultad de Estudios Superiores-Cuautitlán (FESC), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 76231, Querétaro, Qro, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8652-0079
Ofelia MoraLaboratorio de Rumiología y Metabolismo Nutricional (RuMeN), Facultad de Estudios Superiores-Cuautitlán (FESC), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), 76231, Querétaro, Qro, Mexico. ofemora66@unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-7740

Funding

PAPIIT-UNAM IN213021PAPIIT-UNAM IT200621UNAM Postdoctoral Program POSDOC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct-fed microorganisms (DFM) are recognized as an alternative to antibiotic-based growth promoters in poultry production due to their health benefits. DFM, however, should undergo rigorous safety testing to ensure they meet the criteria to be "Generally Recognized as Safe." This study assessed eight bacterial consortia (BC) isolated from the ileal and cecal intestinal regions of wild-type chickens, subjecting them to probiotic tests. Subsequently, they were spray- and freeze-dried to evaluate their storage stability for 30 days. BC5-I and BC7-I, isolated from the ileum, emerged as promising DFM, displaying a high content of Lactobacillales using a selective medium and higher susceptibility to Gram-positive and Gram-negative antibiotics. These BC showed a high tolerance to temperature (> 90%), pH > 4 (88-98%), and antagonist effects against Escherichia coli and Salmonella. BC5-I exhibited superior survival in the simulated gastric conditions and satisfactory intestine mucus adhesion. Freeze-drying was the best method to obtain BC5-I and BC7-I powders, with a survival efficiency of 80.3% and 73.2%, respectively, compared to the beginning of storage. BC5-I presented the lowest cell death rate and prolonged half-life through survival storage kinetics. BC5-I only contained Lactobacillus, and Limosilactobacillus reuteri was the predominant species in liquid (78.3%) and freeze-dried (59.8%) forms. BC5-I stands out as a promising Lactobacillus-based DFM that could improve chicken intestinal health and enhance meat and egg production.

Indexed as

BacteriaChickensIntestinesMicrobial ConsortiaProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsFreeze DryingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLactobacillusMicrobiotaPoultry industryProbioticsStorage stability

Identifiers

PMID39448448
PMCPMC12634797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.