SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2024
Efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for treatment of post refractive surgery pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of pilocarpine for the treatment of presbyopia: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Optimising the Therapeutic Window: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Pregabalin Dosing Strategies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of pregabalin for pain after third molar surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of common pharmacological strategies for post-photorefractive keratectomy pain management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Is Botulinum toxin A effective in treating dry eye disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Is there an association between retinal vein occlusion and cerebrovascular accident? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Is Multiwavelength Photobiomodulation Effective and Safe for Age-Related Macular Degeneration? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Do people with diabetes have a higher risk of developing postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025Review
- Is Thermal Pulsation Therapy Effective for Dry Eyes Before and After Cataract Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Is a thermal pulsation system (LipiFlow) effective as a standalone treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFor ophthalmic patients, eye discomfort is a major problem that requires efficient pain treatment techniques. Pregabalin and gabapentin have surfaced as viable treatments for post-refractive surgery pain. To manage pain after refractive surgery, gabapentin and pregabalin were evaluated in this systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODOLOGY: A thorough search of databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL was performed until March 2024. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials assessing pregabalin and/or gabapentin's effectiveness in treating pain post-PRK, LASIK, and LASEK surgeries.
resultsSix studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 391 patients undergoing various corneal surgeries. The meta-analysis revealed that pregabalin was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing pain on the first and second postoperative days (SMD day 1: -0.32, 95% CI -0.54, -0.09; SMD day 2: -0.55, 95% CI -0.85, -0.25), while gabapentin showed significant pain reduction on the second day only (SMD day 2: -0.42, 95% CI -0.71, -0.13). Combined analysis for both medications showed significant pain reduction on the first- and second-days post-surgery. No significant increase in adverse events was associated with either medication. Publication bias was minimal except for a slight asymmetry noted on day 1 effectiveness.
conclusionPregabalin and gabapentin are effective in reducing postoperative pain following refractive surgeries, with pregabalin showing a greater effect. Both medications are safe, with no significant increase in adverse events. Further research with standardized methodologies and long-term follow-up is recommended to optimize postoperative pain management in ocular surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39448432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.