SynthesisBMJ open2024
Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment for postoperative axial symptoms of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Integrated Strategy for Decoding Bioactive Components and Mechanism of Jingtong Granules: Chemical Characterization, Network Analysis, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2026Article
- Yiqi Daozhi Formula Reduces the M1 Polarization of Macrophages in Mice With Postoperative Ileus Through Mediating Glycolysis Metabolism.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAxial symptoms (AS) represent one of the primary complications after cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) surgery. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), as a complementary and alternative therapy, is widely used in the treatment of postoperative AS in CSM. However, it lacks standardised treatment protocols, uniform therapeutic criteria, assessment methods and a sufficiently in-depth understanding of its mechanisms of action. These shortcomings impact the credibility of TCM treatment in clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct comprehensive searches, both manual and electronic, on literature published up to 31 July 2024, and database searches will commence after the publication of this agreement, with an estimated commencement date of 1 October 2024 and the end date of 31 March 2025, without language restrictions. Key databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WHO International Clinical Trial Registration Platform, China National Knowledge Network, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Scientific Journal Database and Wanfang Database will be explored. In addition, we will include resources such as library journals and conference abstracts. After identifying and screening all randomised controlled trials focused on TCM for postoperative AS of CSM, the two investigators will conduct a meta-analysis of the included studies. The results will be summarised as the risk ratio for binary data and the standardised or weighted average difference for continuous data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required since this review does not involve individual patient data. The review's findings will provide clinicians with evidence on using TCM treatment for AS post-CSM surgery, disseminated through peer-reviewed publications or conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024505160.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.