Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2024
Impact of select actionable genomic alterations on efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03158129 (Phase II Study of Induction Checkpoint Blockade for Untreated Stage I-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Amenable for Surgical Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Study of Induction Checkpoint Blockade for Untreated Stage I-IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Amenable for Surgical Resection
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-small cell lung cancer research: advances and persistent challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Predictive factors for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Perioperative Therapy in Oncogene-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Strategies and Unanswered Questions.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2025Review
- The role of immunotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- New advances in understanding the mechanisms and treatment challenges of ALK-targeted therapy resistance in lung cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the impact of actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) on the efficacy of neoadjuvant ICIs remains unclear. We report the influence of AGAs on treatment failure (TF) in patients with resectable NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant ICIs.
methodsTumor molecular profiles were obtained from patients with stage I-IIIA resectable NSCLC (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition) treated with either neoadjuvant nivolumab (N, n=23) or nivolumab+ipilimumab (NI, n=21) followed by surgery in a previously reported phase-2 randomized study (NCT03158129). TF was defined as any progression of primary lung cancer after neoadjuvant ICI therapy in patients without surgery, radiographic and/or biopsy-proven primary lung cancer recurrence after surgery, or death from possibly treatment-related complications or from primary lung cancer since randomization. Tumors with AGAs (n=12) were compared with tumors without AGAs and non-profiled squamous cell carcinomas (non-AGAs+NP SCC, n=20).
resultsWith a median follow-up of 60.2 months, the overall TF rate was 34.1% (15/44). Tumor molecular profiling was retrospectively obtained in 47.7% (21/44) of patients and select AGAs were identified in 12 patients: 5 epidermal growth factor receptor
conclusionsPatients with NSCLC harboring select AGAs, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.