Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39447548›Full record

ArticleNeuroendocrinology2025

Comparative Targeted Genome Profiling between Solid and Liquid Biopsies in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study.

Irene Gagliardi, Federica Campolo, Patricia Borges de Souza, Lucrezia Rossi, Manuela Albertelli, Federica Grillo, Luigi Caputi, Massimiliano Mazza, Antongiulio Faggiano, Maria Chiara Zatelli

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Irene GagliardiSection of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Federica CampoloDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Patricia Borges de SouzaIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Lucrezia RossiSection of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Manuela AlbertelliEndocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Federica GrilloAnatomic Pathology, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Luigi CaputiFreelancer - Independent Researcher, Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano MazzaIRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Antongiulio FaggianoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Chiara ZatelliSection of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, maria.chiara.zatelli@unife.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical presentation and genetic profile of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are highly variable, hampering their management. Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA from liquid biopsy (LB) has been proposed as a less invasive alternative to solid biopsy (SB). Our aim was to compare the mutational profile (MP) provided by LB with that deriving from SB in GEP-NETs.

methodsSB and LB were derived simultaneously from 6 GEP-NET patients. A comparative targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed on DNA from SB and LB to evaluate the mutational status of 11 genes (MEN1, DAXX, ATRX, MUTYH, SETD2, DEPDC5, TSC2, ARID1A, CHECK2, MTOR, and PTEN).

resultsPatients (M:F = 2:1; median age 64 years) included 3 with pancreatic and 3 with ileal NETs. NGS detected a median number of 55 variants/sample in SB and 66.5 variants/sample in LB specimens (mutational burden: 0.2-1.9 and 0.3-1.8 mut/Mb, respectively). Missense and nonsense mutations were prevalent in both, mainly represented by C>T transitions. ARID1A, MTOR, and ATRX were consistently mutated in SB, and ARID1A, TSC2, MEN1, PTEN, SETD2, and MUTYH were consistently mutated in LB. DAXX mutations were absent in LB. Seventeen recurrent mutations were shared between SB and LB; in particular, MTOR single-nucleotide variants c.G4731A and c.C2997T were shared by 5 out of 6 patients. Hierarchical clustering supported genetic similarity between SB and LB.

conclusionsThis pilot study explores the applicability of LB in GEP-NET MP evaluation. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate LB and to define the clinical impact.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiopsyFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMutationPilot ProjectsProof of Concept StudyCirculating tumor DNAGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumorGenome profilingLiquid biopsy

Identifiers

PMID39447548
PMCPMC12169798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.