ArticleNeuroendocrinology2025
Comparative Targeted Genome Profiling between Solid and Liquid Biopsies in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Proof-of-Concept Pilot Study.
Article in Neuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Molecular Profiles, Biomarkers, and Pathways to Personalized Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genetic insight into lung neuroendocrine tumors: Notch and Wnt signaling pathways as potential targets.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Special Issue Advancements and Challenges in Neuroendocrine Tumor Research.Neuroendocrinology · 2025Article
- Integrative Molecular Analysis to Predict Clinical Benefit of Everolimus in Patients With Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs).Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinical presentation and genetic profile of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) are highly variable, hampering their management. Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA from liquid biopsy (LB) has been proposed as a less invasive alternative to solid biopsy (SB). Our aim was to compare the mutational profile (MP) provided by LB with that deriving from SB in GEP-NETs.
methodsSB and LB were derived simultaneously from 6 GEP-NET patients. A comparative targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed on DNA from SB and LB to evaluate the mutational status of 11 genes (MEN1, DAXX, ATRX, MUTYH, SETD2, DEPDC5, TSC2, ARID1A, CHECK2, MTOR, and PTEN).
resultsPatients (M:F = 2:1; median age 64 years) included 3 with pancreatic and 3 with ileal NETs. NGS detected a median number of 55 variants/sample in SB and 66.5 variants/sample in LB specimens (mutational burden: 0.2-1.9 and 0.3-1.8 mut/Mb, respectively). Missense and nonsense mutations were prevalent in both, mainly represented by C>T transitions. ARID1A, MTOR, and ATRX were consistently mutated in SB, and ARID1A, TSC2, MEN1, PTEN, SETD2, and MUTYH were consistently mutated in LB. DAXX mutations were absent in LB. Seventeen recurrent mutations were shared between SB and LB; in particular, MTOR single-nucleotide variants c.G4731A and c.C2997T were shared by 5 out of 6 patients. Hierarchical clustering supported genetic similarity between SB and LB.
conclusionsThis pilot study explores the applicability of LB in GEP-NET MP evaluation. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate LB and to define the clinical impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.