Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39447196›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2024

Developing Independent Living Support for Older Adults Using Internet of Things and AI-Based Systems: Co-Design Study.

Claire M Timon, Emma Heffernan, Sophia Kilcullen, Louise Hopper, Hyowon Lee, Pamela Gallagher, Alan F Smeaton, Kieran Moran, Pamela Hussey, Catriona Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claire M TimonSchool of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, D02DH60, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-6003
Emma HeffernanSchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-0489
Sophia KilcullenRoyal College of Physicians, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6161-248X
Louise HopperSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9382-5241
Hyowon LeeSchool of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4395-7702
Pamela GallagherSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-1269
Alan F SmeatonInsight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1028-8389
Kieran MoranSchool of Health & Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2015-8967
Pamela HusseyCentre for eIntegrated Care, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2840-9361
Catriona MurphySchool of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3262-1130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The number of older people with unmet health care and support needs is increasing substantially due to the challenges facing health care systems worldwide. There are potentially great benefits to using the Internet of Things coupled with artificial intelligence to support independent living and the measurement of health risks, thus improving quality of life for the older adult population. Taking a co-design approach has the potential to ensure that these technological solutions are developed to address specific user needs and requirements. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate stakeholders' perceptions of independent living and technology solutions, identify stakeholders' suggestions on how technology could assist older adults to live independently, and explore the acceptability and usefulness of a prototype Internet of Things solution called the NEX system to support independent living for an older adult population. Methods: The development of the NEX system was carried out in 3 key phases with a strong focus on diverse stakeholder involvement. The initial predesign exploratory phase recruited 17 stakeholders, including older adults and family caregivers, using fictitious personas and scenarios to explore initial perceptions of independent living and technology solutions. The subsequent co-design and testing phase expanded this to include a comprehensive web-based survey completed by 380 stakeholders, encompassing older adults, family caregivers, health care professionals, and home care support staff. This phase also included prototype testing at home by 7 older adults to assess technology needs, requirements, and the initial acceptability of the system. Finally, in the postdesign phase, workshops were held between academic and industry partners to analyze data collected from the earlier stages and to discuss recommendations for the future development of the system. Results: The predesign phase revealed 3 broad themes: loneliness and technology, aging and technology, and adopting and using technology. The co-design phase highlighted key areas where technology could assist older adults to live independently: home security, falls and loneliness, remote monitoring by family members, and communication with clients. Prototype testing revealed that the acceptability aspects of the prototype varied across technology types. Ambient sensors and voice-activated assistants were described as the most acceptable technology by participants. Last, the postdesign analysis process highlighted that ambient sensors have the potential for automatic detection of activities of daily living, resulting in key recommendations for future developments and deployments in this area. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the significance of incorporating diverse stakeholder perspectives in developing solutions that support independent living. Additionally, it emphasizes the advantages of prototype testing in home environments, offering crucial insights into the real-world experiences of users interacting with technological solutions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceIndependent LivingInternet of ThingsAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesagingAIalgorithmartificial intelligencedaily living activitieselderlygeriatricgerontologyindependent livingInternet of ThingsIoTmedical deviceolder adultpractical modelpredictive analyticspredictive modelpredictive systemQoLquality of lifewearable electronic device

Identifiers

PMID39447196
PMCPMC11527418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.