ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024
Understanding the Significance of Layer Bonding in Melt Electrowriting.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimisation of Bioinspired Fibre Architectures for 3D-Printed Polymer Heart Valves via Melt Electrowriting (MEW) Using FE Modelling and Design of Experiments (FE-DOE).Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rational Design and Functionalization of Melt Electrowritten 4D Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Topology-optimized melt-electrowritten PCL patch for abdominal wall reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Designing Smartly: Understanding the Crystallinity of Melt Electrowritten Scaffolds.Engineering in life sciences · 2025Article
- Understanding the Significance of Layer Bonding in Melt Electrowriting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Melt electrowriting (MEW) is a high-resolution additive manufacturing technology capable of depositing micrometric fibers onto a moving collector to form 3D scaffolds of controlled mechanical properties. While the critical role of layer bonding to achieve mechanical integrity in fused deposition modeling has been widely reported, it remains largely unknown in MEW, in part due to a lack of methods to assess it. Here, a systematic framework is developed to unravel the significance of layer bonding in MEW scaffolds and its ultimate effect on their mechanical properties. Results show that printing parameters, scaffold design, and print path have a strong impact on layer bonding strength of poly(ɛ-caprolactone) MEW scaffolds. This study demonstrates that a small increase of 5 µm in fiber diameter can enhance the layer bonding strength by as much as 70%, greatly impacting the overall scaffold properties. A method is also established to control MEW scaffold layer bonding using a heated collector. Importantly, this study reveals that scaffold architecture alone is not responsible for the overall mechanical properties. Finally, a method to obtain tailored layer bond strengths within a given scaffold is established. This has significant implications as provides new possibilities to control mechanical properties of MEW scaffolds through layer bonding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.