Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39447154›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Understanding the Significance of Layer Bonding in Melt Electrowriting.

Christopher D Lamb, Brooke Maitland, Matt S Hepburn, Tim R Dargaville, Brendan F Kennedy, Paul D Dalton, Adrian Keating, Elena M De-Juan-Pardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding the Significance of Layer Bonding in Melt Electrowriting.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher D LambT3mPLATE, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre Nedlands and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8596-4111
Brooke MaitlandT3mPLATE, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre Nedlands and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Matt S HepburnSchool of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Tim R DargavilleCentre for Materials Science, School of Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia.
Brendan F KennedySchool of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Paul D DaltonPhil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.
Adrian KeatingSchool of Engineering, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.
Elena M De-Juan-PardoT3mPLATE, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre Nedlands and Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-7497

Funding

C. Lamb The William and Marlene Schrader FoundationMineral Resources
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melt electrowriting (MEW) is a high-resolution additive manufacturing technology capable of depositing micrometric fibers onto a moving collector to form 3D scaffolds of controlled mechanical properties. While the critical role of layer bonding to achieve mechanical integrity in fused deposition modeling has been widely reported, it remains largely unknown in MEW, in part due to a lack of methods to assess it. Here, a systematic framework is developed to unravel the significance of layer bonding in MEW scaffolds and its ultimate effect on their mechanical properties. Results show that printing parameters, scaffold design, and print path have a strong impact on layer bonding strength of poly(ɛ-caprolactone) MEW scaffolds. This study demonstrates that a small increase of 5 µm in fiber diameter can enhance the layer bonding strength by as much as 70%, greatly impacting the overall scaffold properties. A method is also established to control MEW scaffold layer bonding using a heated collector. Importantly, this study reveals that scaffold architecture alone is not responsible for the overall mechanical properties. Finally, a method to obtain tailored layer bond strengths within a given scaffold is established. This has significant implications as provides new possibilities to control mechanical properties of MEW scaffolds through layer bonding.

Indexed as

3D printinglayer bondingmechanical propertiesmelt electrowritingtissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID39447154
PMCPMC11653759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.