Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39447091›Full record

ReviewJCO global oncology2024

Barriers to Implementing a Quality Improvement Program in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Adequacy of Resources.

Debanjan Pain, Emily MacDuffie, Yehoda M Martei, Megan Kassick, Daniel J Ikeda, Lawrence N Shulman, Lina Loaiza Salazar, Dayssy Diaz Pardo, Shona Nag, Surbhi Grover

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JCO global oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementation of an electronic registry to monitor quality of care for febrile episodes in pediatric patients with cancer in Central America and the Caribbean.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cancer registries in Pakistan: a scoping review.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2025
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Debanjan PainDepartment of Medicine (Hematology-Oncology Division), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-4811-4547
Emily MacDuffieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-8512
Yehoda M MarteiDepartment of Medicine (Hematology-Oncology Division), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-1567
Megan KassickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Daniel J IkedaDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Lawrence N ShulmanDepartment of Medicine (Hematology-Oncology Division), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-473X
Lina Loaiza SalazarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinica Somer, Antioquia, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0005-3199-476X
Dayssy Diaz PardoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-5743
Shona NagDepartment of Oncology, Sahyadri Group of Hospitals, Pune, India.
Surbhi GroverDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7443-5937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) report disproportionally worse cancer mortality. Current global cancer control efforts focus predominantly on expanding access to multimodality treatment for patients, whereas less attention has been spent on implementing strategies to ensure sustained quality assessment and improvement across the cancer care continuum. The goal of this focused review was to examine specific resource barriers to the development and implementation of quality improvement programs in LMICs. In this article, we use a nonsystematic review process to discuss the existing literature on four resource barriers within the context of cancer care delivery in LMICs, focusing on staff, time allocated for quality improvement work, research infrastructure, and funding. We provide possible solutions to address these barriers and share examples of specific quality improvement initiatives implemented across different world regions. Possible solutions to address these resource barriers include investment in human resources by increasing recruitment and training of the workforce, engagement of medical trainees and patients in quality improvement work, establishment of cancer registries and electronic medical records, and prioritization by large international funding agencies to invest in quality improvement research in LMICs. This review highlights four prevalent resources barriers to quality improvement in LMICs. Using examples from Botswana, Colombia, India, and Rwanda, we demonstrate solutions that may help overcome these barriers.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesQuality ImprovementDelivery of Health CareHealth ResourcesHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39447091
PMCPMC11529835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.