Observational studyPloS one2024
Accuracy of ankle-brachial index in screening for peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes.
Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Fatty Acid Binding Protein 3 and Ankle Brachial Index for Predicting Peripheral Artery Disease Outcomes.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Assessing hemodynamic changes in diabetic patients with and without peripheral arterial disease using dynamic vascular optical spectroscopy.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Effect of Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Customized Foot Insole on Peripheral Circulation and Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting major amputation risk in hospitalized diabetic foot ulcer patients: a single-center study with temporal external validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Serum Trimethylamine N-Oxide Levels Are Associated with Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Apolipoprotein B48 as a Marker of Residual Coronary Risk: Diagnostic Insights from a Comparative Analysis with Ankle-Brachial Index.The Kobe journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the ankle-brachial index (ABI) presents overall satisfactory accuracy, its sensitivity in the context of screening strategies does not ensure the detection of all individuals with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), especially in clinical situations where there is calcification of the arterial media layer. This study evaluated the accuracy of ABI in screening PAD among individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) in a community setting. An observational study included only individuals with DM. ABI measurement was performed, and the lower limb duplex ultrasound (DU) was used as the reference standard for PAD diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) of ABI were assessed. The analysis included 194 limbs from 99 participants, with a PAD prevalence identified by DU of 15.98%. ABI demonstrated an accuracy of 87.63%, with a sensitivity of 35.48%, specificity of 97.55%, PPV of 73.33%, NPV of 89.83%, LR+ of 14.46, and LR- of 0.66. ABI showed high specificity but limited sensitivity in detecting PAD among individuals with DM in a community setting. An LR- of 0.66 suggests that a normal ABI result reduces but does not eliminate the possibility of PAD, highlighting the importance of complementary diagnostic approaches to enhance accuracy in identifying PAD in high-risk patients, such as those with DM. Incorporating additional diagnostic methods may be necessary to improve the effectiveness of PAD screening in this group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.