ArticlePloS one2024
Engineered red Opto-mGluR6 Opsins, a red-shifted optogenetic excitation tool, an in vitro study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bionic vision technologies: progress and perspectives on retinal prostheses and optogenetics for the treatment of advanced retinal degeneration.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Review
- Correction: Engineered red Opto-mGluR6 Opsins, a red-shifted optogenetic excitation tool, an in vitro study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Degenerative eye diseases cause partial or complete blindness due to photoreceptor degeneration. Optogenetic gene therapy is a revolutionary technique combining genetics and optical methods to control the function of neurons. Due to the inherent risk of photochemical damage, the light intensity necessary to activate Opto-mGluR6 surpasses the safe threshold for retinal illumination. Conversely, red-shifted lights pose a significantly lower risk of inducing such damage compared to blue lights. We designed red-shifted Opto-mGluR6 photopigments with a wide, red-shifted working spectrum compared to Opto-mGluR6 and examined their excitation capability in vitro. ROM19, ROM18 and ROM17, red-shifted variants of Opto-mGluR6, were designed by careful bioinformatics/computational studies. The predicted molecules with the best scores were selected, synthesised and cloned into the pAAV-CMV-IRES-EGFP vector. Expression of constructs was confirmed by functional assessment in engineered HEK-GIRK cells. Spectrophotometry and patch clamp experiments demonstrated that the candidate molecules were sensitive to the desired wavelengths of the light and directly coupled light stimuli to G-protein signalling. Herein, we introduce ROM17, ROM18 and ROM19 as newly generated, red-shifted variants with maximum excitation red-shifted of ~ 40nm, 70 nm and 126 nm compared to Opto-mGluR6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.