ArticlePloS one2024
Enhanced automated detection of outbreaks of a rare antimicrobial-resistant bacterial species.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Exploring the Utility of MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry and Antimicrobial Resistance in Hospital Outbreak Detection.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Recent insights into actinobacteria research in antimicrobial resistance: a review.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Not forgetting the humanitarian contexts in the fight against antimicrobial resistance: Operational-driven reflection on knowledge and research gaps by Médecins Sans Frontières.PLOS global public health · 2025Review
- Leveraging disease outbreak news to strengthen the global response to antimicrobial resistance: a call for action.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a crucial strategy to combat AMR. Using routine surveillance data, we could detect and control hospital outbreaks of AMR bacteria as early as possible. Previously, we developed a framework for automatic detection of clusters of AMR bacteria using SaTScan, a free cluster detection tool integrated into WHONET. WHONET is a free software used globally for microbiological surveillance data management. We applied this framework to data from the Japan Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (JANIS), one of the world's most comprehensive and largest national AMR surveillance systems. Although WHONET-SaTScan has several cluster detection algorithms, no published studies have compared how different algorithms can produce varying results in cluster detection. Here, we conducted a comparison to detect clusters of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), which has been rare in Japan, by analyzing combinations of resistance to several key antimicrobials ("resistance profiles") using the comprehensive national routine AMR surveillance data of JANIS and validated the detection capabilities of each algorithm using publicly available reports of VRE clusters. All publicly reported VRE hospital outbreaks were detected as statistical clusters using the space-time uniform algorithm implemented in WHONET-SaTScan. In contrast, only 18.8% of the publicly reported outbreaks were detected using another algorithm (space-time permutation). The space-time uniform algorithm was also effective in identifying hospital wards affected by outbreaks attributed to specific resistance profiles. Although half of the publicly reported outbreaks were attributed to VRE resistant to five particular antimicrobials, four other resistance profiles also contributed to the outbreaks, highlighting the diversity of AMR bacteria within these occurrences. Our comparison revealed a clear advantage in using an algorithm (space-time uniform) for detecting VRE clusters in WHONET-SaTScan based on national surveillance data and further demonstrated the capability to distinguish detected clusters based on resistance profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.