ArticlePloS one2024
DecentralDC: Assessing data contribution under decentralized sharing and exchange blockchain.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The issue of data quality has emerged as a critical concern, as low-quality data can impede data sharing, diminish intrinsic value, and result in economic losses. Current research on data quality assessment primarily focuses on four dimensions: intrinsic, contextual, presentational, and accessibility quality, with intrinsic and presentational quality mainly centered on data content, and contextual quality reflecting data usage scenarios. However, existing approaches lack consideration for the behavior of data within specific application scenarios, which encompasses the degree of participation and support of data within a given scenario, offering valuable insights for optimizing resource deployment and business processes. In response, this paper proposes a data contribution assessment method based on maximal sequential patterns of behavior paradigms (DecentralDC). DecentralDC is composed of three steps: (1) mining the maximal sequential patterns of sharing and exchange behavior paradigms; (2) determining the weights of these paradigms; (3) calculating the contribution of sharing and exchange databases combined with data volume. To validate our approach, two sharing and exchange scenarios of different scales are established. The experimental results in two scenarios validate the effectiveness of our method and demonstrate a significant reduction in cumulative regret and regret rate in data pricing due to the introduction of data contribution. Specifically, compared to the most competitive baseline, the improvements of mean average precision in two scenarios are 6% and 8%. The code and simulation scenarios have been open-sourced and are available at https://github.com/seukgcode/DecentralDC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.