ArticlePloS one2024
Can deep learning identify humans by automatically constructing a database with dental panoramic radiographs?
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to propose a novel method to identify individuals by recognizing dentition change, along with human identification process using deep learning. Recent and past images of adults aged 20-49 years with more than two dental panoramic radiographs (DPRs) were assumed as postmortem (PM) and antemortem (AM) images, respectively. The dataset contained 1,029 paired PM-AM DPRs from 2000 to 2020. After constructing a database of AM dentition, the degree of similarity was calculated and sorted in descending order. The matched rank of AM identical to an unknown PM was measured by extracting candidate groups (CGs). The percentage of rank was calculated as the success rate, and similarity scores were compared based on imaging time intervals. The matched AM images were ranked in the CG with success rates of 83.2%, 72.1%, and 59.4% in the imaging time interval for extracting the top 20.0%, 10.0%, and 5.0%, respectively. The success rates depended on sex, and were higher for women than for men: the success rates for the extraction of the top 20.0%, 10.0%, and 5.0% were 97.2%, 81.1%, and 66.5%, respectively, for women and 71.3%, 64.0%, and 52.0%, respectively, for men. The similarity score differed significantly between groups based on the imaging time interval of 17.7 years. This study showed outstanding performance of convolutional neural network using dental panoramic radiographs in effectively reducing the size of AM CG in identifying humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.