Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446774›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2024

Prevalence of caregiver hesitancy for vaccinations in children and its associated factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nur Hasnah Maamor, Nor Asiah Muhamad, Nor Soleha Mohd Dali, Fatin Norhasny Leman, Izzah Athirah Rosli, Tengku Puteri Nadiah Tengku Bahrudin Shah, Nurul Hidayah Jamalluddin, Nurul Syazwani Misnan, Zuraifah Asrah Mohamad, Sophia Karen Bakon and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Addressing Faith-Based Concerns about Vaccination.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nur Hasnah MaamorNational Institutes of Health, Sector for Evidence-based Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Nor Asiah MuhamadNational Institutes of Health, Sector for Evidence-based Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-2103
Nor Soleha Mohd DaliInstitute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Fatin Norhasny LemanNational Institutes of Health, Sector for Evidence-based Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-7329-8571
Izzah Athirah RosliNational Institutes of Health, Sector for Evidence-based Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6501-8565
Tengku Puteri Nadiah Tengku Bahrudin ShahNational Institutes of Health, Sector for Evidence-based Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Nurul Hidayah JamalluddinNational Institutes of Health, Sector for Evidence-based Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Nurul Syazwani MisnanNational Institutes of Health, Sector for Evidence-based Healthcare, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Zuraifah Asrah MohamadInstitute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Sophia Karen BakonInstitute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Mohd Hatta Abdul MutalipInstitute for Public Health, National Institutes of Health, Ministry of Health, Setia Alam, Malaysia.
Muhammad Radzi Abu HassanOffice of Director General Ministry of Health, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Nai Ming LaiSchool of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to systematically compare and pool the prevalence of all the known evidence on caregiver hesitancy and to describe the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy among caregiver worldwide such as COVID-19, MMR, Influenza, HPV and others. We searched article from few electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, ProQuest, and Web of Science) from inception to August 2023 using specific keywords for example caregiver, parents, prevalence, factor, hesitancy, and others. We included population-based studies that reported the prevalence of caregiver hesitancy. We used random-effects meta-analyses for pool prevalence estimates of caregiver hesitancy. A total of 765 studies met our inclusion criteria, containing data on 38,210,589 caregivers from seven regions across the globe. Overall or pool prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among caregiver is 25.0% (95% CI: 0.22-0.27, I2 = 99.91%, p = 0.001). Based on the evidence gathered, vaccine hesitancy was found to be religious sentiments, personal beliefs, perceived safety concerns, and a desire for more information from healthcare providers, along with factors related to availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptability of vaccinations. Vaccine safety and efficiency have been identified as the main factor for caregiver vaccine hesitancy globally with a prevalence of 91.4%. Trial registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022331629. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022331629.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19VaccinationVaccination HesitancyChildHumansParentsPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39446774
PMCPMC11500859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.