Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446746›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial.

Allan Musinguzi, Joan R Kasidi, Jillian L Kadota, Fred Welishe, Anne Nakitende, Lydia Akello, Jane Nakimuli, Lynn T Kunihira, Bishop Opira, Yeonsoo Baik and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03934931 (Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03934931 nacompletednot on this map

Options for Delivering Isoniazid-Rifapentine (3HP) for TB Prevention: the 3HP Options Implementation Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2020 to 2025Enrolled1,656ConditionsTuberculosis, Latent Tuberculosis, HIV/AIDSArmsStreamlined weekly DOT visits, Weekly DOT visit reminders, Cost reimbursement DOT, 99DOTS, Weekly SAT dosing reminders/check-ins
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Allan MusinguziInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9941-6433
Joan R KasidiInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4761-462X
Jillian L KadotaCenter for Tuberculosis and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-8681
Fred WelisheInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Anne NakitendeInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Lydia AkelloInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Jane NakimuliInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Lynn T KunihiraUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Walimu, Kampala, Uganda.
Bishop OpiraInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
Yeonsoo BaikDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7016-0438
Devika PatelDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-3588
Amanda SammannDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-7165
Christopher A BergerCenter for Tuberculosis and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Hélène E AschmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1234-4321
Payam NahidCenter for Tuberculosis and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-1311
Robert BelknapDenver Health and Hospital Authority and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Moses R KamyaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-4234
Margaret A HandleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5034-2111
Patrick P J PhillipsCenter for Tuberculosis and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-7024
Noah KiwanukaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2471-9290
Achilles KatambaUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Walimu, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2347-4183
David W DowdyUganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Walimu, Kampala, Uganda.
Adithya CattamanchiCenter for Tuberculosis and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-2601
Fred C SemitalaInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-7640
Anne R KatahoireChild Health and Development Center, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-070X

Funding

Options for Delivery of Short-Course Tuberculosis Preventive Therapy: The 3HP Options TrialR01HL144406 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Adithya Cattamanchi, David Wesley Dowdy · 2018 to 2026
$4.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL144406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three months of isoniazid-rifapentine (3HP) is being scaled up for tuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment (TPT) among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in high-burden settings. More evidence is needed to identify factors influencing successful 3HP delivery. We conducted a qualitative assessment of 3HP delivery nested within the 3HP Options Trial, which compared three optimized strategies for delivering 3HP: facilitated directly observed therapy (DOT), facilitated self-administered therapy (SAT), and patient choice between facilitated DOT and facilitated SAT at the Mulago HIV/AIDS clinic in Kampala, Uganda. We conducted 72 in-depth interviews among PLHIV purposively selected to investigate factors influencing 3HP acceptance and completion. We conducted ten key informant interviews with healthcare providers (HCPs) involved in 3HP delivery to identify facilitators and barriers at the clinic level. We used post-trial 3HP delivery data to assess sustainability. We used thematic analysis (inductive and deductive) to align the emergent themes with the RE-AIM framework dimensions to report implementation outcomes. Understanding the need for TPT, once-weekly dosing, shorter duration, and perceived 3HP safety enhanced acceptance overall. Treatment monitoring by HCPs and reduced risk of HIV status disclosure enabled DOT acceptance. Dosing autonomy enabled SAT acceptance. Switching between DOT and SAT as needed enabled acceptance of patient choice. Dosing reminders, reimbursement for clinical visits, and social support enabled 3HP completion; pill burden, side effects, and COVID-19-related treatment restrictions hindered completion. All HCPs were trained and participated in 3HP delivery with high fidelity. Training, care integration, prior TPT experience with daily isoniazid, and few 3HP-related serious adverse events enabled adoption, whereas initial concerns about 3HP safety among HCPs, and COVID-19 treatment disruptions delayed 3HP adoption. Refresher training and collaboration among HCPs enabled implementation whereas limited diagnostic facilities for adverse events at the clinic hindered implementation. SAT was modified post-trial; DOT was discontinued due to inadequate ongoing financial support beyond the study period. Facilitated delivery strategies made 3HP treatment convenient for PLHIV and were feasible and implemented with high fidelity by HCPs. However, the costs of 3HP facilitation may limit wider scale-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03934931); Registered 2nd May 2019; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03934931?id = NCT03934931&rank = 1.

Identifiers

PMID39446746
PMCPMC11500930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.