Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446725›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2024

Exploring galactagogue use among breastfeeding women: Insights from an observational study.

Agnieszka Garbacz, Paweł Juszczak, Marcin Nowicki, Przemysław Łukasz Kowalczewski, Magdalena Człapka-Matyasik

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnieszka GarbaczDepartment of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0009-0002-0345-8685
Paweł JuszczakDepartment of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Marcin NowickiInstitute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2655-5464
Przemysław Łukasz KowalczewskiDepartment of Food Technology of Plant Origin, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Magdalena Człapka-MatyasikDepartment of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poznań, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding is the optimal form of infant nutrition and remains a critical topic of discussion. In the case of lactation problems, women can be assisted by plant galactagogues designed to induce, sustain, and increase lactation. Reports on the popularity, awareness and knowledge of galactagogues are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the use of galactagogues in the diet among breastfeeding women. The online survey was conducted using anonymized questionnaires, with results collected in the Spring of 2021. Fifty-two women aged 20 to 50 who fed naturally participated in the study, with 69% of respondents being familiar with galactagogues and 42% having used them. The most often indicated herbs were fennel (68%) and anise (45%). Galactagogues were used as ready-to-use herbal lactation mixes (73%). Women found them effective in stimulating lactation (82%) and purchased them in pharmacies (64%) or herbal stores (36%). Respondents were encouraged to use galactagogues by media (32%) and family and friends (45%). Women reported that greater knowledge (57%) would be essential to effectively encourage galactagogues. Breastfeeding women were positive about using plant-based galactagogues and considered them effective. A critical barrier identified by those not using galactagogues was their need for knowledge. The information campaign for pregnant women should include galactagogues as lactation-stimulating herbs.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingGalactogoguesLactationAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultGalactogogues

Identifiers

PMID39446725
PMCPMC11500947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.