Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446717›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Dual-hesitant fermatean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and TOPSIS with their application to multi-criteria decision-making.

Muhammad Amman, Tabasam Rashid, Asif Ali, Olayan Albalawi, Aiedh Mrisi Alharthi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammad AmmanDepartment of Mathematics, School of Sciences, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Tabasam RashidDepartment of Mathematics, School of Sciences, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Asif AliDepartment of Mathematics, School of Sciences, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-2941-9660
Olayan AlbalawiDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7772-0386
Aiedh Mrisi AlharthiDepartment of Mathematics, Turabah University College, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of the Dual-hesitant fermatean fuzzy set (DHFFS) represents a significant advancement in practical implementation, combining Fermatean fuzzy sets and Dual-hesitant sets. This new structure uses membership and non-membership hesitancy and is more adaptable for arriving at values in a domain. Since it has the capability to treat multiple fuzzy sets over the degrees of membership and non-membership, the DHFFS greatly improves the flexibility of approaches to tackle multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems. By applying generalized T-norm (T) and T-conorm (T*) operation, improved union and intersection formulas are derived. The proposed work adopts Hamacher operations such as Hamacher T-conorm (HT*) and Hamacher T-norm (HT) that are more efficient than conventional techniques. New aggregation operators such as Hamacher weighted arithmetic, geometric, power arithmetic, and power geometric are developed for DHFFS. These operators are most beneficial when dealing with a MCDM issue. A case study is used to demonstrate the approachs' accuracy and effectiveness in real-world decision-making. The comparative and sensitivity analysis results show that these operators are more effective than traditional methods. These results show that the proposed methods are efficient and can be applied in large-scale decision-making processes, strengthening the solutions' practical implications.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFuzzy LogicAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39446717
PMCPMC11500944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.