Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446709›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

COVID-19 vaccine uptake and associated risk factors among first antenatal care attendees in Zambia, 2021-2022: A repeated cross-sectional study.

Tannia Tembo, Paul Somwe, Samuel Bosomprah, Elizabeth Heilmann, Kalubi Kalenga, Nyembezi Moyo, Bupe Kabamba, Victoria Seffren, Sombo Fwoloshi, Marie-Reine Rutagwera and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tannia TemboReproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH), Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3800-371X
Paul SomweAnalysis Unit, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Samuel BosomprahAnalysis Unit, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Elizabeth HeilmannCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia.
Kalubi KalengaStrategic Information Unit, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.
Nyembezi MoyoStrategic Information Unit, Center for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3605-9280
Bupe KabambaPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Victoria SeffrenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sombo FwoloshiUniversity Teaching Hospital, Ministry of Health, Lusaka, Zambia.
Marie-Reine RutagweraPATH, Lusaka, Zambia.
Maximillian MusunsePATH, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2583-7881
Linos MwiingaCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia.
Julie R GutmanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Jonas Z HinesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Lusaka, Zambia.
Izukanji SikazweCenter for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (CIDRZ), Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3898-2607

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnant women are considered a high-risk group for COVID-19, and a priority for vaccination. Routine antenatal care (ANC) provides an opportunity to track trends and factors associated with vaccine uptake. We sought to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women attending ANC and assess the factors associated with vaccine in Zambia. We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study in 39 public health facilities in four districts in Zambia from September 2021 to September 2022. Pregnant women who were aged 15-49 years were enrolled during their first ANC visit. Every month, ~20 women per facility were interviewed during individual HIV counseling and testing. We estimated vaccine uptake as the proportion of eligible participants who self-reported having received the COVID-19 vaccine. A total of 9,203 pregnant women were screened, of which 9,111 (99%) were eligible and had vaccination status. Of the 9,111 included in the analysis, 1,818 (20%) had received the COVID-19 vaccine during the study period, with a trend of increasing coverage with time (0.5% in September 2020, 27% in September 2022). Conversely, 3,789 (42%) reported not being offered a COVID-19 vaccine. We found that women aged 40-49 years, had no education or attained some primary school education, were not employed, and had prior COVID-19 infection were significantly associated with vaccine uptake. COVID-19 vaccine uptake among pregnant women was lower than estimates from the general population (27% across the four districts in September 2022), pointing to missed opportunities to protect this high-risk group. ANC visits were a viable point for conducting COVID-19 surveillance. Incorporating the vaccine as part of the routine ANC package might increase coverage in this group.

Identifiers

PMID39446709
PMCPMC11500936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.