ArticlePloS one2024
Catheter-based examination for pulmonary microcirculatory function in patients with pulmonary hypertension.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A device that can evaluate human pulmonary microcirculation is currently unavailable. This study aimed to establish a novel approach for assessing pulmonary microcirculation in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We used a guidewire embedded with temperature and pressure sensors to measure the following pulmonary microcirculatory function indicators: pulmonary flow reserve, pulmonary index of microcirculatory resistance (PIMR), and pulmonary resistive reserve ratio. Adenosine was administered to patients to induce hyperemia in the pulmonary artery for assessment. The correlation between these indicators and various parameters, including serum biomarkers, hemodynamic and respiratory functions, and exercise capacity, were examined. The procedure was performed in 19 patients with moderate PH, without major complications. The minimum effective adenosine dosage for maximal hyperemia, without severe side effects, was 150 μg∙kg-1∙min-1. Multivariate stepwise analysis revealed a positive correlation between the hyperemic PIMR and serum uric acid (p < 0.001) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide levels (p = 0.014). Therefore, this catheter-based method offers an effective means to assess pulmonary microcirculatory function in patients with PH, and the optimal dose of adenosine for this evaluation was 150 μg∙kg-1∙min-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.