Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446469›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2026

Expanding the triangle of U: comparative analysis of the Hirschfeldia incana genome provides insights into chromosomal evolution, phylogenomics and high photosynthesis-related traits.

Nam V Hoang, Nora Walden, Ludovico Caracciolo, Sofia Bengoa Luoni, Moges Retta, Run Li, Felicia C Wolters, Tina Woldu, Frank F M Becker, Patrick Verbaarschot and 7 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nam V HoangBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0782-2835
Nora WaldenCentre for Organismal Studies, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-6791
Ludovico CaraccioloLaboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sofia Bengoa LuoniLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Moges RettaCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4835-7274
Run LiBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Felicia C WoltersBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Tina WolduBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Frank F M BeckerLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Patrick VerbaarschotBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jeremy HarbinsonLaboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Steven M DrieverCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4144-6028
Paul C StruikCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University and Research, PO Box 430, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Herbert van AmerongenLaboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9783-2895
Dick de RidderBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mark G M AartsLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M Eric SchranzBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe Brassiceae tribe encompasses many economically important crops and exhibits high intra- and interspecific phenotypic variation. After a shared whole-genome triplication (WGT) event (Br-α, ~15.9 Mya), differential lineage diversification and genomic changes contributed to an array of divergence in morphology, biochemistry and physiology underlying photosynthesis-related traits. Here, the C3 species Hirschfeldia incana is studied because it displays high photosynthetic rates in high-light conditions. Our aim was to elucidate the evolution that gave rise to the genome of H. incana and its high-photosynthesis traits.

methodsWe reconstructed a chromosome-level genome assembly for H. incana (Nijmegen, v.2.0) using nanopore and chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) technologies, with 409 Mb in size and an N50 of 52 Mb (a 10× improvement over the previously published scaffold-level v.1.0 assembly). The updated assembly and annotation were subsequently used to investigate the WGT history of H. incana in a comparative phylogenomic framework from the Brassiceae ancestral genomic blocks and related diploidized crops. KEY

resultsHirschfeldia incana (x = 7) shares extensive genome collinearity with Raphanus sativus (x = 9). These two species share some commonalities with Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea (A genome, x = 10 and C genome, x = 9, respectively) and other similarities with Brassica nigra (B genome, x = 8). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that H. incana and R. sativus form a monophyletic clade in between the Brassica A/C and B genomes. We postulate that H. incana and R. sativus genomes are results of hybridization or introgression of the Brassica A/C and B genome types. Our results might explain the discrepancy observed in published studies regarding phylogenetic placement of H. incana and R. sativus in relationship to the 'triangle of U' species. Expression analysis of WGT retained gene copies revealed sub-genome expression divergence, probably attributable to neo- or sub-functionalization. Finally, we highlight genes associated with physio-biochemical-anatomical adaptive changes observed in H. incana, which are likely to facilitate its high-photosynthesis traits under high light.

conclusionsThe improved H. incana genome assembly, annotation and results presented in this work will be a valuable resource for future research to unravel the genetic basis of its ability to maintain a high photosynthetic efficiency in high-light conditions and thereby improve photosynthesis for enhanced agricultural production.

Indexed as

BrassicaceaeChromosomes, PlantEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantPhotosynthesisPhylogenyBrassicaceaeBrassica U triangleBrassiceaeHirschfeldia incanahybridization originphotosynthesis evolutionpolyploidysub-genome dominancewhole-genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID39446469
PMCPMC13487439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.