Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39446321›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2024

Theta Burst Stimulation Protocols for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Taro Kishi, Toshikazu Ikuta, Kenji Sakuma, Shun Hamanaka, Yasufumi Nishii, Masakazu Hatano, Shinsuke Kito, Nakao Iwata

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07680959 (The Efficacy of Combined HD-tDCS and iTBS in Treating Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07680959 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

The Efficacy of Combined HD-tDCS and iTBS in Treating Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia

TypeinterventionalSponsorTri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)Ran2024 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsNegative Symptoms in Schizophrenia, Brain Stimulation InterventionArmsactive iTBS followed by active HD-tDCS, active iTBS followed by sham HD-tDCS, sham iTBS followed by active HD-tDCS, sham iTBS followed by sham HD-tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Taro KishiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Toshikazu IkutaDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, School of Applied Sciences, University of Mississippi, Oxford.
Kenji SakumaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Shun HamanakaDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Yasufumi NishiiDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Masakazu HatanoDepartment of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Shinsuke KitoDepartment of Psychiatry, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nakao IwataDepartment of Psychiatry, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: To date, several theta burst stimulation (TBS) protocols, such as intermittent TBS (iTBS), have been proposed; however, previous systematic reviews have revealed inconsistent efficacy findings in individual TBS studies for schizophrenia. Objective: To examine which TBS protocols are associated with the most favorable and acceptable outcomes in adults with schizophrenia. Data Sources: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched for studies published before May 22, 2024. Study Selection: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) published and unpublished randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of any TBS treatment and (2) RCTs including individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, other psychotic disorders, or both. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed the Cochrane standards for data extraction and data quality assessment and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline for reporting. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis application was used to rate the certainty of evidence for meta-analysis results. At least 2 authors double-checked the literature search, data transfer accuracy, and calculations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome of this study was improvement in scores related to negative symptoms. Our frequentist network meta-analysis used a random-effects model. The standardized mean difference (SMD) or odds ratio for continuous or dichotomous variables, respectively, was calculated with 95% CIs. Results: A total of 30 RCTs of 9 TBS protocols, with 1424 participants, were included. Only iTBS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) was associated with reduced negative symptom scores (SMD, -0.89; 95% CI, -1.24 to -0.55), overall symptom scores (SMD, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.48), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale general subscale scores (SMD, -0.57; 95% CI, -0.89 to -0.25), depressive symptom scores (SMD, -0.70; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.37), and anxiety symptom scores (SMD, -0.58; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.24) and improved overall cognitive impairment scores (SMD, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.89 to -0.15) compared with a sham. However, positive symptom score changes, all-cause discontinuation rate, discontinuation rate due to adverse events, headache incidence, and dizziness incidence did not significantly differ between any TBS protocols and sham. Conclusions and Relevance: In this network meta-analysis, iTBS over the L-DLPFC was associated with improved scores for negative, depressive, anxiety, and cognitive symptoms in individuals with schizophrenia and was well tolerated by the participants. Other forms of TBS were not associated with benefit. Further research is needed to assess the potential role of TBS in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39446321
PMCPMC11581676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.